The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making

被引:135
作者
Weber, Bethany J. [1 ]
Huettel, Scott A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Brain Imaging & Anal Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Risk; Delay; Utility; Posterior parietal cortex; Intraparietal sulcus; Choice;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.105
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Many important decisions involve outcomes that are either probabilistic or delayed. Based on similarities in decision preferences, models of decision making have postulated that the same psychological processes may underlie decisions involving probabilities (i.e., risky choice) and decisions involving delay (i.e., intertemporal choice). Equivocal behavioral evidence has made this hypothesis difficult to evaluate. However, a combination of functional neuroimaging and behavioral data may allow identification of differences between these forms of decision making. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activation in subjects making a series of choices between pairs of real monetary rewards that differed either in their relative risk or their relative delay. While both sorts of choices evoked activation in brain systems previously implicated in executive control, we observed clear distinctions between these forms of decision making. Notably, choices involving risk evoked greater activation in posterior parietal and lateral prefrontal cortices, whereas choices involving delay evoked greater activation in the posterior cingulate cortex and the striatum. Moreover, activation of regions associated with reward evaluation predicted choices of a more-risky option, whereas activation of control regions predicted choices of more-delayed or less-risky options. These results indicate that there are differences in the patterns of brain activation evoked by risky and intertemporal choices, suggesting that the two domains utilize at least partially distinct sets of cognitive processes. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 115
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of future self-continuity on intertemporal decision making: a mediated moderating model
    Yang, Ying
    Zhang, Liangxiangwan
    Qu, Weiguo
    Fan, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [42] Distinctive Neural Substrates of low and high Risky Decision Making: Evidence from the Balloon Analog Risk Task
    Jin, Zhenlan
    Li, Simeng
    Wang, Changan
    Chai, Xiaoqian
    Zhang, Junjun
    Li, Ling
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2025, 38 (01)
  • [43] Age differences in the neural basis of decision-making under uncertainty
    Tisdall, Loreen
    Mata, Rui
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 23 (03) : 788 - 808
  • [45] Understanding decision neuroscience: A multidisciplinary perspective and neural substrates
    Miyapuram, Krishna P.
    Pammi, V. S. Chandrasekhar
    DECISION MAKING: NEURAL AND BEHAVIOURAL APPROACHES, 2013, 202 : 239 - 266
  • [46] The influence of temporal focus on individual intertemporal decision-making in life history strategy framework
    Wang, Yue
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Yang, Xiao
    Yuan, Fangyuan
    Li, Ying
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2023, 211
  • [47] The effect of ego depletion on intertemporal decision making: explanation from attribute-based models
    Sun, Hong-Yue
    Chen, Li-Na
    Zhang, Qian
    Jiang, Cheng-Ming
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 44 (05) : 3263 - 3279
  • [48] Effects of emotion on intertemporal decision-making: Explanation from the single dimension priority model
    Jiang Yuanping
    Jiang Chengming
    Hu Tianyi
    Sun Hongyue
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 54 (02) : 122 - 140
  • [49] Neural Basis of Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making
    Lee, Daeyeol
    Seo, Hyojung
    Jung, Min Whan
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, VOL 35, 2012, 35 : 287 - 308
  • [50] "Spillover" or "specificity"? The effect of upward social comparison on intertemporal decision
    Pan, Chao
    Xing, Xiaoli
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 44 (06) : 4282 - 4294