Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinician

被引:12
|
作者
Wong, Chen Pong [1 ]
Gani, Linsey Utami [2 ]
Chong, Le Roy [1 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889, Singapore
[2] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889, Singapore
关键词
Osteoporosis; Bone mineral density; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Guidelines; Pitfalls; DENSITY; FRACTURE; RISK; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11657-020-00808-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A guide to the clinician on the use of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry for the management of osteoporosis and the importance of recognizing its pitfalls. Purpose Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for severe fractures in the aging population worldwide, posing a serious public health issue. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is and remains the main tool for screening of osteoporosis and monitoring of osteoporosis treatment through quantitative measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Employing DXA to measure BMD is not without pitfalls. We set out to analyze and classify the potential pitfalls of DXA acquisitions and BMD measurements encountered in clinical practice in our institution. Methods Technical inaccuracies and discrepancies in BMD interpretation in the history of our department were analyzed and classified into different categories of pitfalls. Results We found that major pitfalls of BMD acquisition and interpretation using DXA can be classified into technical, patient, and interpretive factors. These are illustrated with case examples. Conclusion Good technical understanding of BMD measurements using DXA and recognition of potential pitfalls allow for greater technical and interpretive accuracy, which together hopefully increases the precision of osteoporosis management when practiced in accordance with established clinical guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinician
    Chen Pong Wong
    Linsey Utami Gani
    Le Roy Chong
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 2020, 15
  • [2] Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
    Nelson B. Watts
    Osteoporosis International, 2004, 15 : 847 - 854
  • [3] Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
    Watts, NB
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (11) : 847 - 854
  • [4] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update
    Khalatbari, Hedieh
    Binkovitz, Larry A.
    Parisi, Marguerite T.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (01) : 25 - 39
  • [5] BONE DENSITOMETRY OF THE SPINE AND FEMUR IN CHILDREN BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    KROGER, H
    KOTANIEMI, A
    VAINIO, P
    ALHAVA, E
    BONE AND MINERAL, 1992, 17 (01): : 75 - 85
  • [6] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update
    Hedieh Khalatbari
    Larry A. Binkovitz
    Marguerite T. Parisi
    Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 25 - 39
  • [7] Bone densitometry of the forearm: Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Eckert, P
    Casez, JP
    Thiebaud, D
    Schnyder, P
    Burckhardt, P
    BONE, 1996, 18 (06) : 575 - 579
  • [8] Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry
    Jain, Rajesh K.
    Vokes, Tamara
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2017, 20 (03) : 291 - 303
  • [9] Effects of radioisotopes on the accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for bone densitometry
    Mueller, B
    O'Connor, MK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (03) : 283 - 287
  • [10] Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Does Not Represent Bone Structure in Patients with Osteoporosis A Comparison of Lumbar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry with Vertebral Biopsies
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Palmowski, Yannick
    Strube, Patrick
    Schwemmer, Christin
    Roll, Stephanie
    Zippelius, Timo
    Putzier, Michael
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (13) : 861 - 866