Hemoglobin A1c Versus Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Postpartum Diabetes Screening

被引:96
作者
Jose Picon, Maria [1 ]
Murri, Mora [2 ,3 ]
Munoz, Araceli [1 ]
Carlos Fernandez-Garcia, Jose [1 ]
Gomez-Huelgas, Ricardo [4 ]
Tinahones, Francisco J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Virgen de la Victoria Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Malaga, Spain
[2] Virgen de la Victoria Univ Hosp, Res Lab, IMABIS Fdn, Malaga, Spain
[3] Inst Salud Carlos III, Spanish Biomed Res Ctr Physiopathol Obes & Nutr, Madrid, Spain
[4] Carlos Haya Reg Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Malaga, Spain
关键词
POTENTIAL IMPACT; MELLITUS; WOMEN; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; HBA1C; A1C;
D O I
10.2337/dc11-2111
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE-To determine the usefulness of measuring hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C), alone or combined with the fasting glucose test, compared with the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for the reassessment of the carbohydrate metabolism status in postpartum women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We evaluated the status of carbohydrate metabolism by performing the OGTT and fasting glucose and A1C tests in 231 postpartum women with prior GDM 1 year after delivery. RESULTS-The prevalence of abnormal carbohydrate metabolism was 45.89% by the OGTT criterion, 19.05% by the A1C test criterion, 38.10% by the fasting glucose test criterion, and 46.75% by the A1C-fasting glucose test criteria. Using the OGTT as the gold standard, abnormal carbohydrate metabolism according to the A1C Lest criterion had 22.64% sensitivity and 54.55% positive predictive value; abnormal carbohydrate metabolism by the fasting glucose criterion had 83.02% sensitivity and 100% positive predictive value. The A1C-fasting glucose test criteria classified 18 women with normal carbohydrate metabolism as having abnormal carbohydrate metabolism. Abnormal carbohydrate metabolism by the A1C-fasting glucose test criteria had 83.02% sensitivity and 81.48% positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS-Our results seem to indicate that the MC test criterion alone or in combination with fasting glucose test criterion does not provide a sensitive
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1653
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [2] American Diabetes Association, 2004, Diab Rev (Alexandria, VA), V27, pS88, DOI [10.2337/diacare.27.2007.s88, DOI 10.2337/DIACARE.27.2007.S88]
  • [3] Sociodemographic Correlates of the Increasing Trend in Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Large Population of Women Between 1995 and 2005
    Anna, Vibeke
    van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
    Cheung, N. Wah
    Huxley, Rachel R.
    Bauman, Adrian E.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2008, 31 (12) : 2288 - 2293
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, Diabetes Care, V21 Suppl 2, pB1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P1419, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ac06b6
  • [6] Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bellamy, Leanne
    Casas, Juan-Pablo
    Hingorani, Aroon D.
    Williams, David
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 373 (9677) : 1773 - 1779
  • [7] Preventing type 2 diabetes: public health implications for women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus
    England, Lucinda J.
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    Njoroge, Terry
    Callaghan, William M.
    Bruce, Carol
    Buus, Rebecca M.
    Williamson, David F.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 200 (04) : 365.e1 - 365.e8
  • [8] Guidelines - Management of diabetes from preconception to the postnatal period: summary of NICE guidance
    Mugglestone, Moira A.
    Sekhri, Anuradha
    Fraser, Robert
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7646): : 714 - 717
  • [9] Hark L, 2009, MED NUTR DIS CASE BA, P117
  • [10] Antepartum A1C, maternal diabetes outcomes, and selected offspring outcomes: an epidemiological review
    Katon, Jodie
    Williams, Michelle A.
    Reiber, Gayle
    Miller, Edith
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 265 - 276