Testing the attentional boundary conditions of subliminal semantic priming: the influence of semantic and phonological task sets

被引:13
作者
Adams, Sarah C. [1 ]
Kiefer, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Psychiat, Seal Cognit Electrophysiol, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
关键词
automatic processes; masked semantic priming; unconscious visual processing; attention; task sets; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; LETTER-SEARCH; TIME-COURSE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; SPREADING ACTIVATION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STROOP INTERFERENCE; AUTOMATIC PROCESSES; SPEECH PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2012.00241
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent studies challenged the classical not on of automaticity and indicated that even unconscious automatic semantic processing is under attentional control to some extent. In line with our attentional sensitization model, these data suggest that a sensitization of semantic pathways by a semantic task set is necessary for subliminal semantic priming to occur while non-semantic task sets attenuate priming. In the present study, we tested whether masked semantic priming is also reduced by phonological task sets using the previously developed induction task paradigm. This would substantiate the notion that attention to semantics is necessary for eliciting unconscious semantic priming. Participants first performed semantic and phonological induction tasks that should either activate a semantic or a phonological task set. Subsequent to the induction task, a masked prime word, either associated or non-associated with the following lexical decision target word, was presented. Across two experiments, we varied the nature of the phonological induction task (word phonology vs. letter phonology) to assess whether the attentional focus on the entire word vs. single letters modulates subsequent masked semantic priming. In both experiments, subliminal semantic priming was only found subsequent to the semantic induction task, but was attenuated following either phonological induction task. These results indicate that attention to phonology attenuates subsequent semantic processing of unconsciously presented primes whether or not attention is directed to the entire word or to single letters. The present findings therefore substantiate earlier evidence that an attentional orientation toward semantics is necessary for subliminal semantic priming to be elicited.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   On the role of consonants and vowels in visual-word processing: Evidence with a letter search paradigm [J].
Acha, Joana ;
Perea, Manuel .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2010, 25 (03) :423-438
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Basic Processes in Reading
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, HAUFIGKEITSWORTERBUC
[4]   VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION - A DISSOCIATION OF LEXICAL AND SEMANTIC PROCESSING [J].
BESNER, D ;
SMITH, MC ;
MACLEOD, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (05) :862-869
[5]   SEMANTIC PRIMING AND REPETITION PRIMING FROM MASKED WORDS - EVIDENCE FOR A CENTER-SURROUND ATTENTIONAL MECHANISM IN PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION [J].
CARR, TH ;
DAGENBACH, D .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (02) :341-350
[6]   Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing [J].
Chiappe, PR ;
Smith, MC ;
Besner, D .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (02) :249-253
[7]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[8]   Perception without awareness: Further evidence from a Stroop priming task [J].
Daza, MT ;
Ortells, JJ ;
Fox, E .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (08) :1316-1324
[9]   How automatically is meaning accessed: A review of the effects of attention on semantic processing [J].
Deacon, D ;
Shelley-Tremblay, J .
FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE, 2000, 5 :E82-E94
[10]   Event-related potential indices of semantic priming using masked and unmasked words: evidence that the N400 does not reflect a post-lexical process [J].
Deacon, D ;
Hewitt, S ;
Yang, CM ;
Nagata, M .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (02) :137-146