What makes general practitioners order blood tests for patients with unexplained complaints? A cross-sectional study

被引:18
作者
Koch, Helen [1 ]
van Bokhoven, Marloes A. [3 ]
ter Riet, Gerben [1 ,2 ]
Hessels, Kirsten M. [3 ]
van der Weijden, Trudy [3 ]
Dinant, Geert-Jan [3 ]
Bindels, Patrick J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Div Clin Methods & Publ Hlth, Dept Gen Practice, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Maastricht, Dept Gen Practice, Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Blood test ordering; unexplained complaints; determinants; cross-sectional study;
D O I
10.1080/13814780902855762
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Approximately 13% of consultations in general practice involve patients with unexplained complaints (UCs). These consultations often end with general practitioners (GPs) ordering blood tests of questionable diagnostic informativeness. Objective: We studied factors potentially associated with GPs' decisions to order blood tests. Methods: Cross-sectional study. Twenty-seven GPs completed registration forms after each consultation concerning newly presented UCs. Results: Of the 100 analysable patients, 59 had at least one blood test ordered. The median number of ordered tests was 10 (interpercentile range [IPR-90] 2-15). Compared to abdominal complaints, the blood test ordering (BTO) probability for fatigue was five times higher (relative risk [RR] 5.2). Duration of complaints for over 4 weeks also increased this probability (RR 1.6). Factors associated with a lower BTO probability were: likelihood of background psychosocial factors (RR 0.4) and GPs having a syndrome rather than symptom type of working hypothesis (RR 0.5). Conclusion: We found a high rate of BTO among GPs confronted with patients with UCs. Furthermore, a considerable number of tests were ordered. The selectivity in BTO behaviour of GPs can be improved upon.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Factors predicting differences among general practitioners in test ordering behaviour and in the response to feedback on test requests [J].
BugterMaessen, AMA ;
Winkens, RAG ;
Grol, RPTM ;
Knottnerus, JA ;
Kester, ADM ;
Beusmans, GHMI ;
Pop, P .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1996, 13 (03) :254-258
[2]   Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general practitioners' and patients' perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats [J].
Butler, CC ;
Rollnick, S ;
Pill, R ;
Maggs-Rapport, F ;
Stott, N .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7159) :637-642
[3]   PHYSICIAN VARIATION IN DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN - WHO YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET [J].
CHERKIN, DC ;
DEYO, RA ;
WHEELER, K ;
CIOL, MA .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1994, 37 (01) :15-22
[4]  
CONNELLY D, 1980, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V104, P59
[5]  
Dinant GJ vWM, 1994, HUISARTS WETENSCHAP, V37, P202
[6]   MEASURING PHYSICIAN ATTITUDES TOWARD COST, UNCERTAINTY, MALPRACTICE, AND UTILIZATION REVIEW [J].
GOOLD, SD ;
HOFER, T ;
ZIMMERMAN, M ;
HAYWARD, RA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 9 (10) :544-549
[7]  
Haggerty Jeannie, 2005, Can Fam Physician, V51, P1658
[8]  
Hartley R M, 1987, Am J Med, V82, P513, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90452-9
[9]   INFLUENCE OF PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS ON TEST ORDERING IN GENERAL-PRACTICE [J].
HARTLEY, RM ;
CHARLTON, JR ;
HARRIS, CM ;
JARMAN, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 289 (6447) :735-738
[10]  
Hindmarsh JT, 1996, CLIN BIOCHEM, V29, P291