A Meta-Analysis of Probiotic Efficacy for Gastrointestinal Diseases

被引:306
|
作者
Ritchie, Marina L. [1 ]
Romanuk, Tamara N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Biol, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; ANTIBIOTIC-ASSOCIATED DIARRHEA; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE DISEASE; LACTOBACILLUS-PLANTARUM; 299V; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; HELICOBACTER-PYLORI; SACCHAROMYCES-BOULARDII; BIFIDOBACTERIUM-LONGUM; ORAL BACTERIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0034938
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Meta-analyses on the effects of probiotics on specific gastrointestinal diseases have generally shown positive effects on disease prevention and treatment; however, the relative efficacy of probiotic use for treatment and prevention across different gastrointestinal diseases, with differing etiology and mechanisms of action, has not been addressed. Methods/Principal Findings: We included randomized controlled trials in humans that used a specified probiotic in the treatment or prevention of Pouchitis, Infectious diarrhea, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium difficile Disease, Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea, Traveler's Diarrhea, or Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Random effects models were used to evaluate efficacy as pooled relative risks across the eight diseases as well as across probiotic species, single vs. multiple species, patient ages, dosages, and length of treatment. Probiotics had a positive significant effect across all eight gastrointestinal diseases with a relative risk of 0.58 (95% (CI) 0.51-0.65). Six of the eight diseases: Pouchitis, Infectious diarrhea, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium difficile Disease, and Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea, showed positive significant effects. Traveler's Diarrhea and Necrotizing Enterocolitis did not show significant effects of probiotcs. Of the 11 species and species mixtures, all showed positive significant effects except for Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Bifidobacterium infantis. Across all diseases and probiotic species, positive significant effects of probiotics were observed for all age groups, single vs. multiple species, and treatment lengths. Conclusions/Significance: Probiotics are generally beneficial in treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal diseases. Efficacy was not observed for Traveler's Diarrhea or Necrotizing Enterocolitis or for the probiotic species L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, and B. infantis. When choosing to use probiotics in the treatment or prevention of gastrointestinal disease, the type of disease and probiotic species (strain) are the most important factors to take into consideration.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Probiotic Strain Efficacy in the Prevention of Eczema in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mansfield, Joseph A.
    Bergin, Samuel W.
    Cooper, James R.
    Olsen, Cara H.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2014, 179 (06) : 580 - 592
  • [32] Utilizing Probiotics for the Prevention and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Diseases
    Milner, Erin
    Stevens, Benjamin
    An, Martino
    Lam, Victoria
    Ainsworth, Michael
    Dihle, Preston
    Stearns, Jocelyn
    Dombrowski, Andrew
    Rego, Daniel
    Segars, Katharine
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [33] Which is the best probiotic treatment strategy to prevent the necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants A network meta-analysis revealing the efficacy and safety
    Bi, Le-wee
    Yan, Bei-lei
    Yang, Qian-yu
    Li, Miao-miao
    Cui, Hua-lei
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (41)
  • [34] A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. as Immunomodulating Inflammatory Responses
    Ervina, Waode Fifin
    Madyawati, Sri Pantja
    Saputro, Iswinarno Doso
    Safari, Dodi
    Putri, Rury Eryna
    Zulqaida, Salma
    MEDENIYET MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 39 (02): : 122 - 131
  • [35] Role of probiotic as adjuvant in treating various infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nelwan, Erni Juwita
    Herdiman, Allerma
    Kalaij, Ayers Gilberth Ivano
    Lauditta, Richella Khansa
    Yusuf, Syarif Maulana
    Suarthana, Eva
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [36] Efficacy of Probiotics for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhang, Cunzheng
    Zhang, Jindong
    Sun, Feng
    Duan, Liping
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [37] The danger of network meta-analysis: Obscuring the evidence of probiotic strain-specificity
    McFarland, Lynne V.
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2020, 21 (07) : 426 - 427
  • [38] Systematic review with meta-analysis: Effects of probiotic supplementation on symptoms in functional dyspepsia
    Agah, Shahram
    Akbari, Abolfazl
    Heshmati, Javad
    Sepidarkish, Mahdi
    Morvaridzadeh, Mojgan
    Adibi, Payman
    Mazidi, Mohsen
    Farsi, Farnaz
    Ofori-Asenso, Richard
    Talley, Nicholas J.
    Feinle-Bisset, Christine
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS, 2020, 68
  • [39] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of probiotic supplementation on functional constipation in children
    Jin, Lei
    Deng, Lin
    Wu, Wei
    Wang, Zhenyi
    Shao, Wanjin
    Liu, Jianhua
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (39)
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of probiotics as adjuvant agents for Helicobacter pylori infection: A meta-analysis
    Lv, Zhifa
    Wang, Ben
    Zhou, Xiaojiang
    Wang, Fucai
    Xie, Yong
    Zheng, Huilie
    Lv, Nonghua
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (03) : 707 - 716