Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [2 ]
Troendle, James F. [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Biostat & Bioinformat Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing data; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Stratification; Subclassification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference [J].
Nogueira, Ana Rita ;
Pugnana, Andrea ;
Ruggieri, Salvatore ;
Pedreschi, Dino ;
Gama, Joao .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2022, 12 (02)
[42]   Evaluation of propensity score methods for causal inference with high-dimensional covariates [J].
Gao, Qian ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Sun, Hongwei ;
Wang, Tong .
BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (04)
[43]   Causal inference methods for small non-randomized studies: Methods and an application in COVID-19 [J].
Friedrich, Sarah ;
Friede, Tim .
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 99
[44]   Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation [J].
Waernbaum, Ingeborg .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (15) :1572-1581
[45]   A ROBUST AND EFFICIENT APPROACH TO CAUSAL INFERENCE BASED ON SPARSE SUFFICIENT DIMENSION REDUCTION [J].
Ma, Shujie ;
Zhu, Liping ;
Zhang, Zhiwei ;
Tsai, Chih-Ling ;
Carroll, Raymond J. .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2019, 47 (03) :1505-1535
[46]   Bayesian jackknife empirical likelihood-based inference for missing data and causal inference [J].
Chen, Sixia ;
Wang, Yuke ;
Zhao, Yichuan .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2025, 53 (01)
[47]   AN APPLICATION OF CAUSAL INFERENCE FOR OBSERVATIONAL DATA IN HARD DISK DRIVE FAILURE ANALYSIS [J].
Zhang, Shaoang ;
Ou, Eve ;
Limando, Alvin .
16TH ISSAT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY AND QUALITY IN DESIGN, 2010, :65-+
[48]   Practically effective adjustment variable selection in causal inference [J].
Noda, Atsushi ;
Isozaki, Takashi .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-COMPLEXITY, 2025, 6 (01)
[49]   Universal Difference-in-Differences for Causal Inference in Epidemiology [J].
Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen ;
Park, Chan ;
Richardson, David B. .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01) :16-22
[50]   Stochastic intervention for causal inference via reinforcement learning [J].
Duong, Tri Dung ;
Li, Qian ;
Xu, Guandong .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 482 :40-49