Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [2 ]
Troendle, James F. [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Biostat & Bioinformat Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing data; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Stratification; Subclassification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Causal inference with noisy data: Bias analysis and estimation approaches to simultaneously addressing missingness and misclassification in binary outcomes
    Shu, Di
    Yi, Grace Y.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (04) : 456 - 468
  • [32] Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions
    Linden, Ariel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (06) : 1065 - 1071
  • [33] An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference
    Ren, Kaili
    Drummond, Christopher A.
    Brewster, Pamela S.
    Haller, Steven T.
    Tian, Jiang
    Cooper, Christopher J.
    Zhang, Biao
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (27) : 5009 - 5028
  • [34] THE FOUNDATIONS OF CAUSAL INFERENCE
    Pearl, Judea
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 40, 2010, 40 : 75 - 149
  • [35] Using Causal Inference in Field Development Optimization: Application to Unconventional Plays
    Antoine Bertoncello
    Georges Oppenheim
    Philippe Cordier
    Sébastien Gourvénec
    Jean-Philippe Mathieu
    Eric Chaput
    Tobias Kurth
    [J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2020, 52 : 619 - 635
  • [36] Causal Inference via Sparse Additive Models with Application to Online Advertising
    Sun, Wei
    Wang, Pengyuan
    Yin, Dawei
    Yang, Jian
    Chang, Yi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-NINTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, : 297 - 303
  • [37] On adaptive propensity score truncation in causal inference
    Ju, Cheng
    Schwab, Joshua
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (06) : 1741 - 1760
  • [38] Credible Causal Inference for Empirical Legal Studies
    Ho, Daniel E.
    Rubin, Donald B.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, VOL 7, 2011, 7 : 17 - 40
  • [39] On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference
    Vansteelandt, Stijn
    Bekaert, Maarten
    Claeskens, Gerda
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (01) : 7 - 30
  • [40] Causal Inference in Radiomics: Framework, Mechanisms, and Algorithms
    Ghosh, Debashis
    Mastej, Emily
    Jain, Rajan
    Choi, Yoon Seong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16