Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application

被引:29
作者
Zhang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Chen, Zhen [2 ]
Troendle, James F. [3 ]
Zhang, Jun [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Div Biostat, Off Surveillance & Biometr, Ctr Devices & Radiol Hlth, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, Biostat & Bioinformat Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NHLBI, Off Biostat Res, Div Cardiovasc Sci, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, MOE, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Xinhua Hosp, Shanghai Key Lab Childrens Environm Hlth, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Double robustness; Inverse probability weighting; Missing data; Outcome regression; Propensity score; Stratification; Subclassification; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The current statistical literature on causal inference is primarily concerned with population means of potential outcomes, while the current statistical practice also involves other meaningful quantities such as quantiles. Motivated by the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL), a large observational study of obstetric labor progression, we propose and compare methods for estimating marginal quantiles of potential outcomes as well as quantiles among the treated. By adapting existing methods and techniques, we derive estimators based on outcome regression (OR), inverse probability weighting, and stratification, as well as a doubly robust (DR) estimator. By incorporating stratification into the DR estimator, we further develop a hybrid estimator with enhanced numerical stability at the expense of a slight bias under misspecification of the OR model. The proposed methods are illustrated with the CSL data and evaluated in simulation experiments mimicking the CSL.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 706
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity analysis for causal inference using inverse probability weighting
    Shen, Changyu
    Li, Xiaochun
    Li, Lingling
    Were, Martin C.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 53 (05) : 822 - 837
  • [22] Bayesian Nonparametric Modeling for Causal Inference
    Hill, Jennifer L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 20 (01) : 217 - 240
  • [23] Bayesian causal inference: a critical review
    Li, Fan
    Ding, Peng
    Mealli, Fabrizia
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2023, 381 (2247):
  • [24] Causal inference for social discrimination reasoning
    Qureshi, Bilal
    Kamiran, Faisal
    Karim, Asim
    Ruggieri, Salvatore
    Pedreschi, Dino
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 54 (02) : 425 - 437
  • [25] The Possibility of Causal Inference in Social Sciences
    Ishida, Hiroshi
    SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY AND METHODS, 2012, 27 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [26] Causal Inference and Estimands in Clinical Trials
    Lipkovich, Ilya
    Ratitch, Bohdana
    Mallinckrodt, Craig H.
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 54 - 67
  • [27] Multiple robustness estimation in causal inference
    Wang, Lei
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2019, 48 (23) : 5701 - 5718
  • [28] Doubly robust criterion for causal inference
    Baba, Takamichi
    Ninomiya, Yoshiyuki
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2025,
  • [29] Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions
    Linden, Ariel
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (06) : 1065 - 1071
  • [30] A Causal Dirichlet Mixture Model for Causal Inference from Observational Data
    Lin, Adi
    Lu, Jie
    Xuan, Junyu
    Zhu, Fujin
    Zhang, Guangquan
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 11 (03)