A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models

被引:1072
作者
McCaffrey, Daniel F. [1 ]
Griffin, Beth Ann [2 ]
Almirall, Daniel [3 ]
Slaughter, Mary Ellen [1 ]
Ramchand, Rajeev [2 ]
Burgette, Lane F. [2 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Survey Res Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
causal effects; causal modeling; GBM; inverse probability of treatment weighting; twang; CAUSAL INFERENCE; SUBCLASSIFICATION; BIAS; ADJUSTMENT;
D O I
10.1002/sim.5753
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The use of propensity scores to control for pretreatment imbalances on observed variables in non-randomized or observational studies examining the causal effects of treatments or interventions has become widespread over the past decade. For settings with two conditions of interest such as a treatment and a control, inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation with propensity scores estimated via boosted models has been shown in simulation studies to yield causal effect estimates with desirable properties. There are tools (e.g., the twang package in R) and guidance for implementing this method with two treatments. However, there is not such guidance for analyses of three or more treatments. The goals of this paper are twofold: (1) to provide step-by-step guidance for researchers who want to implement propensity score weighting for multiple treatments and (2) to propose the use of generalized boosted models (GBM) for estimation of the necessary propensity score weights. We define the causal quantities that may be of interest to studies of multiple treatments and derive weighted estimators of those quantities. We present a detailed plan for using GBM to estimate propensity scores and using those scores to estimate weights and causal effects. We also provide tools for assessing balance and overlap of pretreatment variables among treatment groups in the context of multiple treatments. A case study examining the effects of three treatment programs for adolescent substance abuse demonstrates the methods. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3388 / 3414
页数:27
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PloS One
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Springer Series in Statistics
[4]  
[Anonymous], MED CARE
[5]  
[Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ECONOMETRIC EVALUATI
[7]  
[Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
[10]  
[Anonymous], AM J EPIDEMIOLOGY