The role of evaluative metadata in an online teacher resource exchange

被引:16
作者
Abramovich, Samuel [1 ]
Schunn, Christian D. [2 ]
Correnti, Richard J. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Lib & Informat Studies, Dept Instruct & Learning, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Learning Res & Dev Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2013年 / 61卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Online; Teaching resources; Metadata; Ratings; Hierarchical linear model; Decision heuristics; LEARNING-RESOURCES; DECISION-MAKING; THINKING; BELIEFS; PLANS;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-013-9317-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A large-scale online teacher resource exchange is studied to examine the ways in which metadata influence teachers' selection of resources. A hierarchical linear modeling approach was used to tease apart the simultaneous effects of resource features and author features. From a decision heuristics theoretical perspective, teachers appear to rely on complex heuristics that integrate many dimensions when determining whether to download a resource. Most surprisingly, numbers of ratings more strongly predict downloads than do mean rating levels, such that multiple negative ratings appear to attract more downloads than do few positive ratings. Implications for system design are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 883
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Studying teacher selection of resources in an ultra-large scale interactive system: Does metadata guide the way? [J].
Abramovich, Samuel ;
Schunn, Christian .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (01) :551-559
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, INT REV RES OPEN DIS
[3]  
Ball D.L., 1996, EDUC RESEARCHER, V25, P6, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X025009006, 10.3102/0013189X025009006, 10.3102/0013189x025009006]
[4]  
Brown M.W., 2003, Teaching as design: Can we better understand the ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to support their changes in practice?
[5]   User-oriented quality for OER: understanding teachers' views on re-use, quality, and trust [J].
Clements, K. I. ;
Pawlowski, J. M. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2012, 28 (01) :4-14
[6]   A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK TO GUIDE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHER REFLECTION AND DECISION-MAKING [J].
COLTON, AB ;
SPARKSLANGER, GM .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 1993, 44 (01) :45-54
[7]  
Czerlinski J., 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart, P97
[8]  
Davis E.A., 2005, ED RES, V34, P3, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X034003003, 10.3102/0013189X034003003]
[9]  
Dholakia U.M., 2006, WHAT MAKES OPEN ED P
[10]  
Diekema A.R., 2011, P AM SOC INFORM SCI, V48, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/MEET.2011.14504801189