Cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population with use of suPAR, CRP, and Framingham Risk Score

被引:112
|
作者
Lyngbaek, Stig [1 ]
Marott, Jacob L. [2 ]
Sehestedt, Thomas [3 ]
Hansen, Tine W. [4 ,7 ]
Olsen, Michael H. [5 ,9 ]
Andersen, Ove [6 ]
Linneberg, Allan [7 ,9 ]
Haugaard, Steen B. [6 ,8 ]
Eugen-Olsen, Jesper [6 ,9 ]
Hansen, Peter R. [1 ]
Jeppesen, Jorgen [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hosp, Copenhagen City Heart Study, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Herlev Hosp, Dept Cardiol, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Clin Physiol & Nucl Med & PET, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, Dept Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[7] Univ Copenhagen, Glostrup Hosp, Res Ctr Prevent & Hlth, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Hosp Amager, Dept Internal Med, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth Sci, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark
关键词
Biomarkers; Cardiovascular risk; C-reactive protein; Framingham Risk Score; Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor; PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR RECEPTOR; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; SOLUBLE UROKINASE RECEPTOR; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; HEART-DISEASE; MORTALITY; MEN; PREVENTION; RELEASE; MARKER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.07.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The inflammatory biomarkers soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) independently predict cardiovascular disease (CVD). The prognostic implications of suPAR and CRP combined with Framingham Risk Score (FRS) have not been determined. Methods: From 1993 to 1994, baseline levels of suPAR and CRP were obtained from 2315 generally healthy Danish individuals (mean [SD] age: 53.9 [10.6] years) who were followed for the composite outcome of ischemic heart disease, stroke and CVD mortality. Results: During a median follow-up of 12.7 years, 302 events were recorded. After adjusting for FRS, women with suPAR levels in the highest tertile had a 1.74-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.81, p=0.027) and men a 2.09-fold (95% CI: 1.37-3.18, p<0.001) increase in risk compared to the lowest tertile. Including suPAR and CRP together resulted in stronger risk prediction with a 3.30-fold (95% CI: 1.36-7.99, p<0.01) increase for women and a 3.53-fold (1.78-7.02, p<0.001) increase for men when both biomarkers were in the highest compared to the lowest tertile. The combined extreme tertiles of suPAR and CRP reallocated individuals predicted to an intermediate 10-year risk of CVD of 10-20% based on FRS, to low (<10%) or high (>20%) risk categories, respectively. This was reflected in a significant improvement of C statistics for men (p=0.034) and borderline significant for women (p=0.054), while the integrated discrimination improvement was highly significant (P <= 0.001) for both genders. Conclusions: suPAR provides prognostic information of CVD risk beyond FRS and improves risk prediction substantially when combined with CRP in this setting. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2904 / 2911
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Framingham Risk Score, SCORE and WHO/ISH cardiovascular risk prediction models in an Asian population
    Selvarajah, Sharmini
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Haniff, Jamaiyah
    Cheong, Kee Chee
    Hiong, Tee Guat
    van der Graaf, Yolanda
    Bots, Michiel L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 176 (01) : 211 - 218
  • [2] Are Physical Fitness and CRP Related to Framingham Risk Score in HIV+ Adults?
    Lewis, John E.
    Poles, Jillian
    Garretson, Eleanor
    Tiozzo, Eduard
    Goldberg, Sharon
    Campbell, Carmen S. G.
    Simoes, Herbert G.
    Woolger, Judi M.
    Konefal, Janet
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE, 2022, 16 (02) : 229 - 240
  • [3] The Framingham risk score underestimates the risk of cardiovascular events in the HER2-positive breast cancer population
    Law, W.
    Johnson, C.
    Rushton, M.
    Dent, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : E348 - E353
  • [4] Cardiovascular risk stratification obtained by Framingham risk score and creactive protein measurement
    Bard, RL
    Clarke, N
    Rubenfire, M
    Eagle, K
    Brook, RD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (05) : 224A - 224A
  • [5] The Association of suPAR with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Young and Healthy Adults
    Wohlwend, Niklas Fabio
    Grossmann, Kirsten
    Aeschbacher, Stefanie
    Weideli, Ornella C.
    Telser, Julia
    Risch, Martin
    Conen, David
    Risch, Lorenz
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (18)
  • [6] Cardiovascular disease risk prediction by Framingham risk score in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
    Amiri, Mina
    Mousavi, Maryam
    Noroozzadeh, Mahsa
    Azizi, Fereidoun
    Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 23 (01)
  • [7] The risk of cardiovascular disease following breast cancer by Framingham risk score
    Gernaat, Sofie A. M.
    Boer, Jolanda M. A.
    van den Bongard, Desiree H. J.
    Maas, Angela H. E. M.
    van der Pol, Carmen C.
    Bijlsma, Rhode M.
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Peeters, Petra H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 170 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [8] Should eGFR and Albuminuria Be Added to the Framingham Risk Score? Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction
    Chang, Alex
    Kramer, Holly
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 119 (02): : C171 - C177
  • [9] Recalibration of Framingham Risk Score for predicting 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in a South Indian population
    Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish
    Sasikumar, Midhun
    Demissie, Getu Debalkie
    Pramodkumar, Thyparambil Aravindakshan
    Oldenburg, Brian
    Oommen, Anu Mary
    JOURNAL OF DIABETOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01) : 101 - 112
  • [10] Does Erectile Dysfunction Contribute to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction Beyond the Framingham Risk Score?
    Araujo, Andre B.
    Hall, Susan A.
    Ganz, Peter
    Chiu, Gretchen R.
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Kupelian, Varant
    Travison, Thomas G.
    McKinlay, John B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (04) : 350 - 356