Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use

被引:5
|
作者
Zhao, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Gabriel, Jose Luis [2 ,3 ]
Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez [2 ]
Feng, Zhe [1 ,4 ]
Wu, Kening [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Nacl Invest & Tecnol Agr & Alimentaria INIA, Madrid, Spain
[3] UPM, Ctr Estudios & Invest Gest Riesgos Agr & Medioamb, Madrid, Spain
[4] MNR, Technol Innovat Ctr Land Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] MNR, Key Lab Land Consolidat, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
agro-ecosystem; bayesian belief networks; soil ecosystem services; soil parameters; soil multi-functionality; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COVER CROPS; NITROGEN; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; DIVERSITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil provides a diverse and complex range of ecosystem services. Understanding the trade-offs and synergies among soil functions is foundational for effective soil ecosystem management and human well-being. In contrast, the long-term pursuit of solely productive functions in cultivated land use has resulted in soil degradation and weakened other ecological functions. This study collected soil, topographic landform, climate, and management data from 151 fields in four counties and three climatic zones in China. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate nutrient retention, water production, and carbon storage, and the market value method was used to evaluate the value of the soil production function. A semi-quantitative model of Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) was used to simulate soil processes, thus revealing factors potentially influencing the supply capacity of five soil functions. Sensitivity analysis was used to identify the key variables influencing soil functional supply, and the probabilistic inference was used to identify interactions among soil's multiple functions. The main findings were as follows: 1) In four counties, the spatial heterogeneity in the supply of the five soil functions was relatively high. 2) The primary variables influencing the supply of soil's multiple functions were climatic conditions, management level, carbon storage, soil nutrients, soil biology, soil structure, and topography. 3) Trade-offs existed among primary productivity (PP), water purification and regulation (WPR), and carbon sequestration and regulation (CSR). Moreover, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity (PFIB), WPR, and CSR were synergistic; specifically, the CSR and WPR services synergized with the nutrient provision and cycling (PCN). This research may aid in understanding the supply of, and interactions among soil's multiple functions, thus aiding in using BBNs to analyze soil ecosystem services. In addition, this study may provide a reference for management decision-making to maximize the overall benefits of soil functions in cultivated land use.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating agricultural land, water yield and soil conservation trade-offs into spatial land use planning
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Sun, Wenyi
    Li, Pengfei
    Mu, Xingmin
    Gao, Peng
    Zhao, Guangju
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 104 : 219 - 228
  • [32] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Ecosystem Services for Different Land Use Scenarios in the Yili River Valley, China
    Shi, Mingjie
    Wu, Hongqi
    Fan, Xin
    Jia, Hongtao
    Dong, Tong
    He, Panxing
    Baqa, Muhammad Fahad
    Jiang, Pingan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 15
  • [33] Exploring trade-offs in agro-ecological landscapes: Using a multi-objective land-use allocation model to support agroforestry research
    Reith, Esther
    Gosling, Elizabeth
    Knoke, Thomas
    Paul, Carola
    BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 64 : 103 - 119
  • [34] Identification of Land Use Function Bundles and Their Spatiotemporal Trade-Offs/Synergies: A Case Study in Jiangsu Coast, China
    Huang, Sihua
    Wang, Yuan
    Liu, Rongjuan
    Jiang, Yu
    Qie, Lu
    Pu, Lijie
    LAND, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [35] Metacoupled Tourism and Wildlife Translocations Affect Synergies and Trade-Offs among Sustainable Development Goals across Spillover Systems
    Zhao, Zhiqiang
    Cai, Meng
    Connor, Thomas
    Chung, Min Gon
    Liu, Jianguo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [36] Analysing trade-offs in adaptation decision-making—agricultural management under climate change in Finland and Sweden
    Lotten Wiréhn
    Janina Käyhkö
    Tina-Simone Neset
    Sirkku Juhola
    Regional Environmental Change, 2020, 20
  • [37] Land use function changes and trade-offs/synergies across topographic gradients in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China
    Zhang, Haozhe
    Tang, Qiang
    He, Xiubin
    Yang, Qingyuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 469
  • [38] Integrating Sustainable Water Resource Management and Land Use Decision-Making
    Moltz, Heidi L. N.
    Wallace, Carlington W.
    Sharifi, Erfaneh
    Bencala, Karin
    WATER, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [39] Analysing the Synergies and Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services to Reorient Land Use Planning in Metropolitan Bilbao (Northern Spain)
    Pena, Lorena
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Ametzaga-Arregi, Ibone
    Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [40] USING LANDSCAPE SERVICES TO ADDRESS TRADE-OFFS AND SYNERGIES IN LAND-USE POLICY AND PLANNING. A CASE STUDY IN SCOTLAND
    Munoz-Rojas, Jose
    Brown, Iain
    Gonzalez-Puente, Marc
    Cortines-Garcia, Felipe
    Proell, Julius
    Keay, Rachel
    Karvouni, Freideriki
    LANDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2016, : 254 - 264