Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use

被引:5
|
作者
Zhao, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Gabriel, Jose Luis [2 ,3 ]
Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez [2 ]
Feng, Zhe [1 ,4 ]
Wu, Kening [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Inst Nacl Invest & Tecnol Agr & Alimentaria INIA, Madrid, Spain
[3] UPM, Ctr Estudios & Invest Gest Riesgos Agr & Medioamb, Madrid, Spain
[4] MNR, Technol Innovat Ctr Land Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] MNR, Key Lab Land Consolidat, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
agro-ecosystem; bayesian belief networks; soil ecosystem services; soil parameters; soil multi-functionality; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COVER CROPS; NITROGEN; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURE; DIVERSITY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.1063907
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil provides a diverse and complex range of ecosystem services. Understanding the trade-offs and synergies among soil functions is foundational for effective soil ecosystem management and human well-being. In contrast, the long-term pursuit of solely productive functions in cultivated land use has resulted in soil degradation and weakened other ecological functions. This study collected soil, topographic landform, climate, and management data from 151 fields in four counties and three climatic zones in China. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate nutrient retention, water production, and carbon storage, and the market value method was used to evaluate the value of the soil production function. A semi-quantitative model of Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) was used to simulate soil processes, thus revealing factors potentially influencing the supply capacity of five soil functions. Sensitivity analysis was used to identify the key variables influencing soil functional supply, and the probabilistic inference was used to identify interactions among soil's multiple functions. The main findings were as follows: 1) In four counties, the spatial heterogeneity in the supply of the five soil functions was relatively high. 2) The primary variables influencing the supply of soil's multiple functions were climatic conditions, management level, carbon storage, soil nutrients, soil biology, soil structure, and topography. 3) Trade-offs existed among primary productivity (PP), water purification and regulation (WPR), and carbon sequestration and regulation (CSR). Moreover, the provision of functional and intrinsic biodiversity (PFIB), WPR, and CSR were synergistic; specifically, the CSR and WPR services synergized with the nutrient provision and cycling (PCN). This research may aid in understanding the supply of, and interactions among soil's multiple functions, thus aiding in using BBNs to analyze soil ecosystem services. In addition, this study may provide a reference for management decision-making to maximize the overall benefits of soil functions in cultivated land use.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding trade-offs and synergies among soil functions to support decision-making for sustainable cultivated land use (vol 10, 1063907,2022)
    Zhao, Rui
    Gabriel, Jose Luis
    Martin, Jose Antonio Rodriguez
    Feng, Zhe
    Wu, Kening
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [2] Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing?Tianjin?Hebei region
    Feng, Zhe
    Jin, Xueru
    Chen, Tianqian
    Wu, Jiansheng
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 106
  • [3] Soil multifunctionality: Synergies and trade-offs acrossEuropeanclimatic zones and land uses
    Zwetsloot, Marie J.
    van Leeuwen, Jeroen
    Hemerik, Lia
    Martens, Henk
    Simo Josa, Iolanda
    Van de Broek, Marijn
    Debeljak, Marko
    Rutgers, Michiel
    Sanden, Taru
    Wall, David P.
    Jones, Arwyn
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 72 (04) : 1640 - 1654
  • [4] Automated, administrative decision-making and good governance: Synergies, trade-offs, and limits
    Roehl, Ulrik B. U.
    Hansen, Morten Balle
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2024, 84 (06) : 1184 - 1199
  • [5] Land use for bioenergy: Synergies and trade-offs between sustainable development goals
    Vera, Ivan
    Wicke, Birka
    Lamers, Patrick
    Cowie, Annette
    Repo, Anna
    Heukels, Bas
    Zumpf, Colleen
    Styles, David
    Parish, Esther
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Berndes, Goran
    Jager, Henriette
    Schiesari, Luis
    Junginger, Martin
    Brandao, Miguel
    Bentsen, Niclas Scott
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Harris, Zoe
    van der Hilst, Floor
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 161
  • [6] Trade-offs or synergies? Identifying dynamic land use functions and their interrelations at the grid scale in urban agglomeration
    Yang, Yuanyuan
    Ren, Xuezhen
    Yan, Jinming
    CITIES, 2023, 140
  • [7] Synergies and trade-offs among ecosystems functions and services for three types of lake-edge wetlands
    Loiselle, Audreanne
    Proulx, Raphael
    Larocque, Marie
    Pellerin, Stephanie
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 154
  • [8] Multi-scenario urban growth boundaries and trade-offs among land use functions
    Wei, Jingxian
    Yue, Wenze
    Li, Mengmeng
    Liu, Yong
    Song, Yongze
    CITIES, 2025, 159
  • [9] Ecosystem services of the Southern Ocean: trade-offs in decision-making
    Grant, Susie M.
    Hill, Simeon L.
    Trathan, Philip N.
    Murphy, Eugene J.
    ANTARCTIC SCIENCE, 2013, 25 (05) : 603 - 617
  • [10] Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Zoning Strategies of Multifunctional Trade-Offs and Synergies in Cultivated Land in the Hexi Corridor
    Zhou, Kaichun
    Sun, Zixiang
    Ma, Tingting
    Li, Yulin
    Xie, Binggeng
    LAND, 2025, 14 (02)