Norepinephrine or phenylephrine during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery: a randomised double-blind pragmatic noninferiority study of neonatal outcome

被引:45
作者
Kee, Warwick D. Ngan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Shara W. Y. [3 ]
Ng, Floria F. [1 ]
Lee, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Sidra Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Doha, Qatar
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Hlth Technol & Informat, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Caesarean delivery; hypotension; norepinephrine; obstetric anaesthesia; phenylephrine; spinal anaesthesia; BOLUS NOREPINEPHRINE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; HYPOTENSION; PREVENTION; EPHEDRINE; INFUSION; VASOPRESSORS; EQUIVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.057
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Norepinephrine is an effective vasopressor during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean delivery. However, before it can be fully recommended, possible adverse effects on neonatal outcome should be excluded. We aimed to test the hypothesis that umbilical arterial cord pH is at least as good (non-inferior) when norepinephrine is used compared with phenylephrine for treatment of hypotension. Methods: We enrolled 668 subjects having elective and non-elective Caesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinaleepidural anaesthesia in this randomised, double-blind, two-arm parallel, non-inferiority clinical trial. Arterial blood pressure was maintained using norepinephrine 6 mgml(-1) or phenylephrine 100 mgml(-1) according to the practice of the anaesthetist, either prophylactically or therapeutically, as an infusion or bolus. The primary outcome was umbilical arterial pH with a chosen non-inferiority margin of 0.01 units. Results: Of 664 subjects (531 elective and 133 non-elective) who completed the study, umbilical arterial cord blood was analysed for 351 samples from 332 subjects in the norepinephrine group and 343 samples from 332 subjects in the phenylephrine group. Umbilical arterial pH was non-inferior in the norepinephrine group (mean, 7.289; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.284-7.294) compared with the phenylephrine group (mean, 7.287; 95% CI, 7.281-7.292) (mean difference between groups, 0.002; 95% CI, -0.005 to 0.009; P=0.017). Subgroup analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of norepinephrine for elective cases but was inconclusive for non-elective cases. Conclusions: Norepinephrine was non-inferior to phenylephrine for neonatal outcome assessed by umbilical arterial pH. These results provide high-quality evidence supporting the fetal safety of norepinephrine in obstetric anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 595
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Haemodynamic stability during anaesthesia induction with propofol - impact of phenylephrine. A double-blind, randomised clinical trial [J].
Kamenik, Mirt ;
Kos, Darjan ;
Petrun, Andreja Moller ;
Green, David W. ;
Zorko, Nuska ;
Mekis, Dusan .
SIGNA VITAE, 2018, 14 (01) :20-26
[32]   Wrapping of the legs versus phenylephrine for reducing hypotension in parturients having epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a prospective, randomized and double-blind study [J].
Bjornestad, Elin ;
Iversen, Ole Erik ;
Raeder, Johan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (10) :842-846
[33]   A Comparative Study on The Role of Phenylephrine and Mephentermine in the Treatment of Hypotension During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section [J].
Choudhury, Tridib ;
Mitra, Manasij ;
Shailendra, Kumar ;
Basu, Maitraye .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8 (02) :56-66
[34]   Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine affects prethrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study [J].
Tao, Wenhui ;
Bao, Jinfeng ;
Xie, Yufang ;
Ding, Wei ;
Wu, Yule ;
Zhang, Ye ;
Hu, Xianwen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 111 (01) :644-649
[35]   Effect of norepinephrine and phenylephrine on prothrombotic response in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled study [J].
Tao, Wenhui ;
Xie, Yufang ;
Ding, Wei ;
Bao, Jinfeng ;
Zhang, Ye ;
Hu, Xianwen .
TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
[36]   Comparison of Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusion and Rescue Bolus Administration for Maintaining Blood Pressure During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery in Obese Parturient: A Randomised Control Trial [J].
Hassan, Shamsul Kamalrujan ;
Cui, W. oNG Pit ;
Seevaunnamtum, Praveena ;
Omar, Sanihah C. H. E. ;
Mohamad, Nik Abdullah N. ik .
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 31 (03) :117-124
[37]   Randomised double-blind comparison of bolus phenylephrine or ephedrine for treatment of hypotension in women with pre-eclampsia undergoing caesarean section [J].
Mohta, M. ;
Duggal, S. ;
Chilkoti, G. T. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (07) :839-846
[38]   Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Bolus Regimens During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Hemodynamic Changes [J].
Doherty, Anne ;
Ohashi, Yayoi ;
Downey, Kristi ;
Carvalho, Jose C. A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 115 (06) :1343-1350
[39]   Hemodynamics of Phenylephrine Infusion Versus Lower Extremity Compression During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study [J].
Kuhn, Jana Christine ;
Hauge, Tor Hugo ;
Rosseland, Leiv Arne ;
Dahl, Vegard ;
Langesaeter, Eldrid .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (04) :1120-1129
[40]   Efficacy of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions against Spinal Hypotension during Lower Segment Caesarean Section- A Randomised Clinical Study [J].
Priya, Pachha ;
Devaraj, I. C. ;
Shetty, Nisha S. ;
Srinivasalu, D. ;
Kiranchand, N. ;
Bhaskar, S. Bala .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (07) :UC1-UC6