Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries

被引:36
作者
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vasquez-Mejia, Adrian [4 ]
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos [3 ,5 ]
Nino de Guzman, Ena [5 ]
Perez-Bracchiglione, Javier [6 ]
Rabassa, Montserrat [5 ]
Rigau, David [5 ]
Sola, Ivan [3 ,5 ]
Song, Yang [5 ]
Neamtiu, Luciana [7 ]
Parmelli, Elena [7 ]
Saz-Parkinson, Zuleika [7 ]
Alonso-Coello, Pablo [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Balearic Isl Hlth Res Inst IdISBa, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
[2] Balearic Isl Hlth Serv, Primary Care Res Unit Mallorca, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
[3] CIBER Epidemiol & Salud Publ CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Nacl Mayor San Marcos, Fac Med Humana, Lima, Peru
[5] Biomed Res Inst St Pau IIB St Pau, Iberoamer Cochrane Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, St Antonio Maria Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[6] Univ Valparaiso, Interdisciplinary Ctr Hlth Studies CIESAL, Valparaiso, Chile
[7] Joint Res Ctr JRC, European Commiss, Ispra, Italy
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer; Clinical guidelines; Adherence; Survival; Systematic review; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT; ADJUVANT TREATMENT; QUALITY; THERAPY; IMPACT; OLDER; IMPLEMENTATION; PREDICTOR; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05753-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundBreast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs.MethodsWe searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.ResultsWe included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR=0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR=0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty).ConclusionsOur review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42018092884).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
  • [2] Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells
    Al-Hajj, M
    Wicha, MS
    Benito-Hernandez, A
    Morrison, SJ
    Clarke, MF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (07) : 3983 - 3988
  • [3] AMENT SMC, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V0005
  • [4] Adherence to guidelines and breast cancer patients survival: a population-based cohort study analyzed with a causal inference approach
    Andreano, Anita
    Rebora, Paola
    Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
    Russo, Antonio Giampiero
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (01) : 119 - 131
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, BMJ BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.B375
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, REV MAN REVMAN VERS
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, GRADEPRO GDT GRADEPR
  • [9] Reasons for intentional guideline non-adherence: A systematic review
    Arts, Derk L.
    Voncken, Albertine G.
    Medlock, Stephanie
    Abu-Hanna, Ameen
    van Weert, Henk C. P. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 89 : 55 - 62
  • [10] Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines:: A systematic review
    Bahtsevani, C
    Udén, G
    Willman, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (04) : 427 - 433