Producing synthetic natural gas from microalgae via supercritical water gasification: A techno-economic sensitivity analysis

被引:47
作者
Brandenberger, M. [1 ]
Matzenberger, J. [1 ]
Vogel, F. [1 ]
Ludwig, Ch. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Gen Energy Res Dept ENE LBK, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn ENAC IIE, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Algae; Synthetic natural gas (SNG); Supercritical water gasification; Sensitivity analysis; Bioenergy; Process economics; CONTINUOUS SALT PRECIPITATION; BIODIESEL; SEPARATION; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.038
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
A techno-economic sensitivity analysis of the production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) via catalytic supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of microalgae produced in raceway ponds (RP), tubular-, or flat-panel-airlift photobioreactors (FPA-PBR) has been perfomed. The aim of combining microalgae production with SCWG is to close material flows with respect to water and nutrients, the so called SunCHem process. The sensitivity analysis is based on an annual production of 86,500 t of microalgae biomass yielding 1.14 PJ of methane per year. The sensitivity analysis showed that with an annual algae productivity of 38.5 t per hectare of RP an energy return on energy invested (EROEI) of 1.84 can be achieved for the self-sufficient base case scenario. An SNG production cost of 194 (sic) GJ (1) was obtained for RP. An EROEI of 0.08 was calculated for tubular PBR with a productivity of 75.1 t ha (-1) a(-1) in the base case scenario and thus was found to be inappropriate for SNG production. EROEI for FPA-PBR with an assumed microalgae productivity of 79 t ha (1) a (1) was found to be 1.01 in the base case scenario and an SNG production cost of 266 (sic) GJ (1). With significantly more optimistic assumptions concerning microalgae productivity, energy input and capital requirement with respect to microalgae cultivation, an EROEI of 3.6-5.8 and SNG production costs of 53-90 (sic) GJ (1) were found for RP, whereas for FPA-PBR an EROEI of 2-3.7 and SNG production costs of 30-103 (sic) GJ (1) were obtained. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, KOST VERSCH HEIZS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, NATL RENEW ENERGY LA, DOI DOI 10.2172/15003040
  • [3] Mechanistic Modeling of Broth Temperature in Outdoor Photobioreactors
    Bechet, Quentin
    Shilton, Andy
    Fringer, Oliver B.
    Munoz, Raul
    Guieysse, Benoit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (06) : 2197 - 2203
  • [4] Biodiesel from microalgae
    Chisti, Yusuf
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2007, 25 (03) : 294 - 306
  • [5] Environmental Life Cycle Comparison of Algae to Other Bioenergy Feedstocks
    Clarens, Andres F.
    Resurreccion, Eleazer P.
    White, Mark A.
    Colosi, Lisa M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (05) : 1813 - 1819
  • [6] Optimal process design for the polygeneration of SNG, power and heat by hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: Process optimisation for selected substrates
    Gassner, Martin
    Vogel, Frederic
    Heyen, Georges
    Marechal, Francois
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (05) : 1742 - 1758
  • [7] Optimal process design for the polygeneration of SNG, power and heat by hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: Thermo-economic process modelling and integration
    Gassner, Martin
    Vogel, Frederic
    Heyen, Georges
    Marechal, Francois
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (05) : 1726 - 1741
  • [8] Grima EM, 2003, BIOTECHNOL ADV, V20, P491
  • [9] SunCHem: an integrated process for the hydrothermal production of methane from microalgae and CO2 mitigation
    Haiduc, Anca G.
    Brandenberger, Martin
    Suquet, Sebastien
    Vogel, Frederic
    Bernier-Latmani, Rizlan
    Ludwig, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2009, 21 (05) : 529 - 541
  • [10] Technoeconomic analysis of an integrated microalgae photobioreactor, biodiesel and biogas production facility
    Harun, Razif
    Davidson, Michael
    Doyle, Mark
    Gopiraj, Rajprathab
    Danquah, Michael
    Forde, Gareth
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (01) : 741 - 747