Farmers' willingness to pay for foot and mouth disease vaccine in different cattle production systems in Amhara region of Ethiopia

被引:16
作者
Jemberu, Wudu T. [1 ]
Molla, Wassie [1 ]
Dagnew, Tigabu [2 ]
Rushton, Jonathan [3 ]
Hogeveen, Henk [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gondar, Dept Vet Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Coll Vet Med & Anim Sci, Gondar, Ethiopia
[2] Univ Gondar, Dept Agr Econ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Gondar, Ethiopia
[3] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect & Global Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Business Econ Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 10期
关键词
CONTINGENT VALUATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0239829
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Although foot and mouth disease (FMD) is endemic in Ethiopia, use of vaccines to control the disease has been practiced sparingly. This is due to perceived high cost of good quality FMD vaccine, and consequently limited availability of the vaccine in the market. This study was conducted to assess farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a quality FMD vaccine and identify factors that could potentially influence their WTP in Amhara region of Ethiopia. A total of 398 farmers from four districts that represent the mixed crop-livestock and market oriented production systems were enrolled for the study. The WTP was estimated using contingent valuation method with a double-bound dichotomous choice bid design. Interval regression analysis was used to estimate mean WTP and identify factors that influence it. The results showed that the mean WTP of all farmers was Ethiopian Birr (ETB) 58.23 (95% CI: 56.20-60.26)/annual dose. It was ETB 75.23 (95% CI: 72. 97-74.49) for market oriented farmers and ETB 42.6 (95%CI: 41.24-43.96) for mixed crop livestock farmers. Willingness to pay for the vaccine was significantly higher for farmers in market oriented system than in mixed crop livestock system. It was also significantly higher for farmers whose main livelihood is livestock than those whose main livelihood is other than livestock, and for farmers who keep exotic breed cattle and their crosses than those who keep only local cattle breeds. Willingness to pay significantly increased with increase in FMD impact perception and vaccine knowledge scores of farmers. The high mean WTP estimates showed that farmers are enthusiastic about using the FMD vaccine. Market-oriented farmers with higher willingness to pay may be more likely to pay full cost if official FMD vaccination is planned in the country than mixed crop livestock farmers. Animal health extension about livestock diseases impact and vaccines has a potential to increase farmers' uptake of vaccines for disease control.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   TESTING WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY MODELS OF DISCRETE-CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEY DATA [J].
ALBERINI, A .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1995, 71 (01) :83-95
[2]  
ATA (Agricultural transformation agency), 2017, NAT FOOT MOUTH CONTR
[3]   Farmers' Willingness to Pay for a Tuberculosis Cattle Vaccine [J].
Bennett, Richard ;
Balcombe, Kelvin .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 63 (02) :408-424
[4]  
Brandsma W, 2013, 735 WAG UR LIV RES L
[5]   Drivers of vaccination preferences to protect a low-value livestock resource: Willingness to pay for Newcastle disease vaccines by smallholder households [J].
Campbell, Zoe A. ;
Otieno, Linus ;
Shirima, Gabriel M. ;
Marsh, Thomas L. ;
Palmer, Guy H. .
VACCINE, 2019, 37 (01) :11-18
[6]   Contingent valuation: A user's guide [J].
Carson, RT .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1413-1418
[7]   Benefit-Cost Analysis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccination at the Farm-level in south Vietnam [J].
Dinh Bao Truong ;
Goutard, Flavie Luce ;
Bertagnoli, Stephane ;
Delabouglise, Alexis ;
Grosbois, Vladimir ;
Peyre, Marisa .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 5
[8]  
Dohoo I., 2012, METHODS EPIDEMIOLOGI, P328
[9]  
Freeman A.Myrick., 1993, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[10]   STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY OF DOUBLE-BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, M ;
LOOMIS, J ;
KANNINEN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 73 (04) :1255-1263