Twelve tips for getting started using mixed methods in medical education research

被引:30
作者
Lavelle, Ellen [1 ]
Vuk, Jasna [3 ]
Barber, Carolyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Div Counseling & Educ Psychol, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Off Educ Dev, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
关键词
TYPOLOGY; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.3109/0142159X.2013.759645
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Mixed methods research, which is gaining popularity in medical education, provides a new and comprehensive approach for addressing teaching, learning, and evaluation issues in the field. Aim: The aim of this article is to provide medical education researchers with 12 tips, based on consideration of current literature in the health professions and in educational research, for conducting and disseminating mixed methods research. Conclusion: Engaging in mixed methods research requires consideration of several major components: the mixed methods paradigm, types of problems, mixed method designs, collaboration, and developing or extending theory. Mixed methods is an ideal tool for addressing a full range of problems in medical education to include development of theory and improving practice.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 276
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Three-dimensional Virtual Reality as an Innovative Teaching and Learning Tool for Human Anatomy Courses in Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study [J].
Alharbi, Yasser ;
Al-Mansour, Mubarak ;
Al-Saffar, Radi ;
Garman, Abdullah ;
Al-Radadi, Abdulrahman .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (02)
[42]   Game design elements of serious games in the education of medical and healthcare professions: a mixed-methods systematic review of underlying theories and teaching effectiveness [J].
Aster, Alexandra ;
Laupichler, Matthias Carl ;
Zimmer, Saskia ;
Raupach, Tobias .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2024, 29 (05) :1825-1848
[43]   Evaluating the REP-S brief resilience intervention for students in higher education: a multi-study mixed-methods programme of research [J].
Robinson, Oliver C. ;
Sebah, Ilham ;
McNay, Ian ;
Field, Jennifer ;
Wragg, Jane ;
Stevenson, Mandy ;
Newton, Paul .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE & COUNSELLING, 2021, 49 (05) :672-688
[44]   Lesson learned from assessing teachers' and students' perspectives regarding the quality of e-learning in medical education during the pandemic: a mixed-methods study [J].
Zarifsanaiey, Nahid ;
Farrokhi, Majid Reza ;
Karimian, Zahra ;
Hoseini, Sara ;
Chahartangi, Farshid ;
Shahraki, Hadi Raeisi .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
[45]   Lesson learned from assessing teachers’ and students’ perspectives regarding the quality of e-learning in medical education during the pandemic: a mixed-methods study [J].
Nahid Zarifsanaiey ;
Majid Reza Farrokhi ;
Zahra karimian ;
Sara hoseini ;
farshid chahartangi ;
Hadi Raeisi Shahraki .
BMC Medical Education, 24
[46]   AI Education for Fourth-Year Medical Students: Two-Year Experience of a Web-Based, Self-Guided Curriculum and Mixed Methods Study [J].
Abid, Areeba ;
Murugan, Avinash ;
Banerjee, Imon ;
Purkayastha, Saptarshi ;
Trivedi, Hari ;
Gichoya, Judy .
JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 10
[47]   Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60 [J].
Dolmans, Diana H. J. M. ;
Tigelaar, D. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (01) :1-10
[49]   Responsible research and innovation in science education: insights from evaluating the impact of using digital media and arts-based methods on RRI values [J].
Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel ;
Heras, Maria ;
Berrens, Karla .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 39 (03) :263-284
[50]   Using longitudinal progress test data to determine the effect size of learning in undergraduate medical education - a retrospective, single-center, mixed model analysis of progress testing results [J].
Goerlich, Dennis ;
Friederichs, Hendrik .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2021, 26 (01)