The Mobile App Usability Inspection (MAUi) Framework as a Guide for Minimal Viable Product (MVP) Testing in Lean Development Cycle

被引:163
作者
Cheng, Lin Chou [1 ]
机构
[1] Temasek Polytech, Sch Informat & IT, Singapore, Singapore
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF CHIUXID 2016: BRIDGING THE GAPS IN THE HCI & UX WORLD | 2016年
关键词
Mobile Usability Studies; Heuristic Evaluation; Lean UX; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1145/2898459.2898460
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
\The Mobile App Usability Inspection (MAUi) framework is an improvised user-interface auditing technique based on the classical work of Heuristic Evaluation, pioneered by Jakob Nielsen & Rolf Molich. While the method of HE has been extensively cross-examined and reported in wide arrays of usability testing activities, its potential as a highly reliable inspection procedure is yet to be systematically formalized for lean development cycle. This paper demonstrated the application of the MAUi framework to the evaluation of a high-fidelity prototype that explored touchscreen interactions between three-dimension virtual objects on a mobile device. The initial results suggested that MAUi is a much reliable usability inspection method as the findings, given by four different inspectors shared 85% of true ability from user testing event. In addition, the MAUi framework can be used as a checklist for fine-tuning the readiness of any minimal viable products on mobile device.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] SOFTWARE INSPECTIONS - AN EFFECTIVE VERIFICATION PROCESS
    ACKERMAN, AF
    BUCHWALD, LS
    LEWSKI, FH
    [J]. IEEE SOFTWARE, 1989, 6 (03) : 31 - 36
  • [2] The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools
    Andre, TS
    Hartson, HR
    Belz, SM
    McCreary, FA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2001, 54 (01) : 107 - 136
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, Research-based web design & usability guidelines
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience
  • [6] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [7] Blank S., 2013, Harvard Business Review, May Issue: 65-72
  • [8] Brooke J, 2013, J USABILITY STUD, V8, P29
  • [9] Chattratichart J., 2002, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, P641
  • [10] Chattratichart J., 2004, CHI 04 HUM FACT COMP, P1119