Brokering knowledge from universities to the marketplace The role of knowledge transfer offices

被引:38
作者
Berbegal-Mirabent, Jasmina [1 ]
Sabate, Ferran [1 ]
Canabate, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] UPC Barcelona Tech, Dept Management, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Knowledge broker; Knowledge transfer office; Public/private research organizations; Patents; R&D contracts; Spin-offs; Knowledge management; Research organizations; Research and development; Public sector organizations; Private sector organizations; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; COMMERCIALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACTS; INITIATIVES; RESEARCHERS;
D O I
10.1108/00251741211247012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to conceptualise the role of knowledge transfer offices (KTOs) as knowledge brokers (KBs) and identify which factors are most significantly related with their performance for supporting public-private research organizations (PROs), testing the authors' hypothesis for the Spanish case. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical analysis is conducted based on data from RedOTRI 2008 annual report about 63 Spanish KTOs. A multiple lineal regression model is carried on each of the selected variables representative of KTOs' performance (number of priority patents, revenues from industry collaboration and number of spin-offs) in order to establish possible relationships with some factors related to the knowledge process that characterize KTOs' activity. Findings - A theoretical framework conceptualizing the KTOs' role as knowledge brokers is suggested. Factors positively influencing KTOs' performance are PRO's total annual expenses, the type of PRO, the KTO age, the existence of a science park, the explicit regulation of intellectual property rights, the number of specialized full-time staff of the KTO and the availability of a patent stock. Practical implications - The practical implication is the identification of those critical factors for the day-to-day operation of Spanish KTOs in their different ways of transferring knowledge, drawing managerial and organisational practices that may improve their performance. Originality/value - This paper provides two original contributions for literature on knowledge transfer: a theoretical framework for the conceptualisation of KTOs as KBs, and the categorisation and further analysis of factors closely related to the performance of KTOs. A set of managerial implications for a better improvement of such institutions is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1307
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer [J].
Anderson, Timothy R. ;
Daim, Tugrul U. ;
Lavoie, Francois F. .
TECHNOVATION, 2007, 27 (05) :306-318
[2]  
Belsey D.A., 1980, Regression Diagnostics Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
[3]  
Bielak AT, 2008, COMMUNICATING SCIENCE IN SOCIAL CONTEXTS: NEW MODELS, NEW PRACTICES, P201, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_12
[4]  
Blondel D., 2006, AU CARR SCI TECHN EC
[5]  
Burnett S., 2002, Knowledge and Process Management, V9, P1
[6]   Technology transfer in United States universities - A survey and statistical analysis [J].
Carlsson, B ;
Fridh, AC .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2002, 12 (1-2) :199-232
[7]   Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a 'scientific-economic' framework [J].
Chang, YC ;
Chen, MH ;
Hua, MS ;
Yang, PY .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2006, 73 (02) :199-213
[8]   The impacts of academic patenting and licensing on knowledge production and diffusion: a test of the anti-commons effect in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Yuan-Chieh ;
Yang, Phil Y. .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (03) :321-334
[9]   The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective [J].
Chang, Yuan-Chieh ;
Yang, Phil Y. ;
Chen, Ming-Huei .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (06) :936-946
[10]   Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence [J].
Chapple, W ;
Lockett, A ;
Siegel, D ;
Wright, M .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (03) :369-384