A phylogenetic comparative method for studying multivariate adaptation

被引:115
作者
Bartoszek, Krzysztof [1 ]
Pienaar, Jason [3 ]
Mostad, Petter [1 ]
Andersson, Staffan [2 ]
Hansen, Thomas F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Pretoria, Dept Genet, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[4] Univ Oslo, Dept Biol, CEES, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process; Multivariate phylogenetic comparative method; Adaptation; Optimality; Allometry; MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS; TRAIT EVOLUTION; BRANCH LENGTHS; SELECTION; MATRIX; POLLINATION; INERTIA; RATES; TREE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.08.005
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Phylogenetic comparative methods have been limited in the way they model adaptation. Although some progress has been made, there are still no methods that can fully account for coadaptation between traits. Based on Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) models of adaptive evolution, we present a method, with R implementation, in which multiple traits evolve both in response to each other and, as in previous OU models, to fixed or randomly evolving predictor variables. We present the interpretation of the model parameters in terms of evolutionary and optimal regressions enabling the study of allometric and adaptive relationships between traits. To illustrate the method we reanalyze a data set of antler and body-size evolution in deer (Cervidae). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 215
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   A critical branching process model for biodiversity [J].
Aldous, D ;
Popovic, L .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2005, 37 (04) :1094-1115
[2]   Five Statistical Questions about the Tree of Life [J].
Aldous, David J. ;
Krikun, Maxim A. ;
Popovic, Lea .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2011, 60 (03) :318-328
[3]   ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA WITH HIERARCHICAL AUTOCORRELATION [J].
Ane, Cecile .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2008, 2 (03) :1078-1102
[4]   Macroevolutionary patterns of pollination accuracy: a comparison of three genera [J].
Armbruster, W. Scott ;
Pelabon, Christophe ;
Hansen, Thomas F. ;
Bolstad, Geir H. .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2009, 183 (03) :600-617
[5]   ESTIMATING AND TESTING THE SHAPES OF ADAPTIVE SURFACES - THE MORPHOLOGY AND POLLINATION OF DALECHAMPIA BLOSSOMS [J].
ARMBRUSTER, WS .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1990, 135 (01) :14-31
[6]   The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution [J].
Arnold, SJ ;
Pfrender, ME ;
Jones, AG .
GENETICA, 2001, 112 (1) :9-32
[7]   IS YOUR PHYLOGENY INFORMATIVE? MEASURING THE POWER OF COMPARATIVE METHODS [J].
Boettiger, Carl ;
Coop, Graham ;
Ralph, Peter .
EVOLUTION, 2012, 66 (07) :2240-2251
[8]   Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution [J].
Butler, MA ;
King, AA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 164 (06) :683-695
[9]  
Carroll R.J., 1987, TRANSFORMATION WEIGH
[10]  
Cheverud J.M, 1982, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V59, P129