Revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic femoral fracture using an uncemented modular tapered conical stem

被引:31
作者
da Assuncao, R. E. [1 ]
Pollard, T. C. B. [1 ]
Hrycaiczuk, A. [1 ]
Curry, J. [1 ]
Glyn-Jones, S. [1 ]
Taylor, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford OX3 7HE, England
关键词
PERI-PROSTHETIC FRACTURE; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; VANCOUVER TYPE B2; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; BONE LOSS; CLASSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34431
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a potentially devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty, with historically high rates of complication and failure because of the technical challenges of surgery, as well as the prevalence of advanced age and comorbidity in the patients at risk. This study describes the short-term outcome after revision arthroplasty using a modular, titanium, tapered, conical stem for PFF in a series of 38 fractures in 37 patients. The mean age of the cohort was 77 years (47 to 96). A total of 27 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of at least 3. At a mean follow-up of 35 months (4 to 66) the mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 35 (15 to 48) and comorbidity was significantly associated with a poorer OHS. All fractures united and no stem needed to be revised. Three hips in three patients required further surgery for infection, recurrent PFF and recurrent dislocation and three other patients required closed manipulation for a single dislocation. One stem subsided more than 5 mm but then stabilised and required no further intervention. In this series, a modular, tapered, conical stem provided a versatile reconstruction solution with a low rate of complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1037
页数:7
相关论文
共 65 条
[21]  
Hartman CW, 2011, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V93A, P2311, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.9324icl
[22]   THE POROUS-COATED ANATOMIC TOTAL HIP-PROSTHESIS, INSERTED WITHOUT CEMENT - RESULTS AFTER 5 TO 7 YEARS IN A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
HEEKIN, RD ;
CALLAGHAN, JJ ;
HOPKINSON, WJ ;
SAVORY, CG ;
XENOS, JS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) :77-91
[23]  
Holt Graeme, 2011, Orthopedics, V34, P11, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20101123-02
[24]   Hierarchy of Evidence: Where Observational Studies Fit in and Why We Need Them [J].
Hoppe, Daniel J. ;
Schemitsch, Emil H. ;
Morshed, Saam ;
Tornetta, Paul, III ;
Bhandari, Mohit .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A :2-9
[25]   Distal fixation with Wagner revision stem in treating Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femur fractures in geriatric patients [J].
Ko, PS ;
Lam, JJ ;
Tio, MK ;
Lee, OB ;
Ip, FK .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (04) :446-452
[26]   REVISION THR AFTER PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES - AN ANALYSIS OF 23 CASES [J].
KOLSTAD, K .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (05) :505-508
[27]   Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem [J].
Lakstein, Dror ;
Kosashvili, Yona ;
Backstein, David ;
Safir, Oleg ;
Lee, Paul ;
Gross, Allan E. .
HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 20 (02) :136-142
[28]   Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Porous-coated Modular Stem: 5 to 10 Years Followup [J].
Lakstein, Dror ;
Backstein, David ;
Safir, Oleg ;
Kosashvili, Yona ;
Gross, Allan E. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (05) :1310-1315
[29]   Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty [J].
Laurer, Helmut L. ;
Wutzler, Sebastian ;
Possner, Susann ;
Geiger, Emanuel V. ;
El Saman, Andre ;
Marzi, Ingo ;
Frank, Johannes .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (07) :983-989
[30]   The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem [J].
Learmonth, ID .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (01) :13-19