Measuring agri-food supply chain performance and risk through a new analytical framework: a case study of New Zealand dairy

被引:63
作者
Moazzam, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Akhtar, Pervaiz [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Garnevska, Elena [6 ]
Marr, Norman E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Business Sch, Logist & Supply Chain Management SCM, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Massey Univ, Sch Engn & Adv Technol, Logist & Supply Chain Management, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Univ Hull, Fac Business Law & Polit, Management Syst & Logist, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[4] IESEG Sch Management, Paris, France
[5] Abasyn Univ, Management Sci, Peshawar, Pakistan
[6] Massey Univ, Inst Agr & Environm, Agribusiness, Palmerston North, New Zealand
关键词
Performance measurement frameworks; measuring agri-food supply chain performance and risk; literature review; case study of New Zealand dairy; SCOR model; BALANCED SCORECARD; SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; MITIGATION; OPERATIONS; SYSTEMS; METRICS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/09537287.2018.1522847
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many researchers and practitioners have long recognized the significance of measuring performance. Although general guidelines for measuring business performance are widely available, no appropriate measurement frameworks have been developed for measuring agri-food supply chain performance. Particularly, food quality and risk-related indicators have not been well integrated into existing performance measurement systems. Our research, therefore, addresses this knowledge gap by first providing an in-depth review of extant performance measurement systems and frameworks. It then develops an analytical framework by extending the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model which has been extensively implemented across non-food industries. The analytical framework is further validated by utilizing a case study of 50 farmers and 10 dairy companies, operating in the New Zealand dairy industry. Our pilot testing and subsequent findings show that the individual metrics interlocked with the analytical framework are in-line with the key industrial practices adapted by the New Zealand dairy industry. In addition, the framework is flexible and scalable to evaluate and benchmark other agri-food supply chains - ranging from fresh products such as fruits and vegetables to processed foods such as canned fruits. The findings further show that the detailed information required for measuring the level-3 SCOR metrics is not easily available in the industry, as researchers need to access specific company records that may be confidential. Consequently, this study provides how agri-food supply chain managers can employ our new analytical framework in-conjunction with the SCOR model for a deeper understanding of the complicated performance measurement indicators applied in their agri-food production systems and relevant supply chains.
引用
收藏
页码:1258 / 1274
页数:17
相关论文
共 85 条
[61]   An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments [J].
Rangone, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 1996, 16 (08) :104-&
[62]   Efficiency analysis of supply chain processes [J].
Reiner, G. ;
Hofmann, P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (23) :5065-5087
[63]  
Rota C, 2012, P FOOD SYST DYN, P574
[64]  
Simatupang T.M., 2004, Benchmarking, V77, P9
[65]  
Statistics New Zealand, 2015, **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[66]  
Stewart G., 1997, LOGISTICS INFORM MAN, V10, P62, DOI [10.1108/09576059710815716, https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059710815716, DOI 10.1108/09576059710815716]
[67]  
Tanquintic-Misa E, 2014, NZ FONTERRA LOSES DA
[68]   Supply chain performance measurement framework for small and medium scale enterprises [J].
Thakkar, Jitesh ;
Kanda, Arun ;
Deshmukh, S. G. .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (05) :702-723
[69]   Assessing and managing risks using the Supply Chain Risk Management Process (SCRMP) [J].
Tummala, Rao ;
Schoenherr, Tobias .
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (06) :474-483
[70]  
USDA, 2015, DAIR WORLD MARK TRAD