IS THE TWO-CHOSEN-ONE (2C1) TAXATION IMPLEMENTATION IN THAILAND VALID TO SERVE AS A MODEL FOR HOW 2C1 TAXATION REALLY WORKS?

被引:1
作者
Osterberg, Esa [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Alcohol Drugs & Addict, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Alcohol; alcohol-related harm; low- and middle-income countries; taxation; 2C1; Thailand; ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03756.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1385
页数:1
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
MAKELA K, 1977, ACTA SOCIOL, V20, P155
[2]  
Makela P., 2007, NORD STUD ALCOHOL DR, V24, P617, DOI [10.1177/145507250702400607, DOI 10.1177/145507250702400607]
[3]   Weakening of one more alcohol control pillar: a review of the effects of the alcohol tax cuts in Finland in 2004 [J].
Makela, Pia ;
Osterberg, Esa .
ADDICTION, 2009, 104 (04) :554-563
[4]   Alcohol taxation policy in Thailand: implications for other low- to middle-income countries [J].
Sornpaisarn, Bundit ;
Shield, Kevin D. ;
Rehm, Juergen .
ADDICTION, 2012, 107 (08) :1372-1384