Built for unity: assessing the impact of team composition on team cohesion trajectories

被引:21
作者
Acton, Bryan P. [1 ]
Braun, Michael T. [2 ]
Foti, Roseanne J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Team cohesion; Team composition; Team personality; Growth curve modeling; GOAL ORIENTATION; 5-FACTOR MODEL; THIN SLICES; PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY; DYNAMICS; BEHAVIOR; ATTRACTION; POWER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-019-09654-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Team cohesion is a critical factor for team effectiveness. Cohesion is a dynamic emergent state, demonstrating important changes as a function of the interactions among team members. Given the important role of individual differences for impacting the quality of social interactions as well as the resulting appraisals of individuals, it is not surprising that a plethora of studies find significant relationships between team composition and team cohesion. Unfortunately, knowledge of how individual difference composition influences changes in cohesion over time is still lacking. Therefore, drawing on theories on the development of interpersonal relationships, we tested predictions regarding the role of team personality and goal orientation for shaping the longitudinal trajectories of social and task cohesion. More specifically, we used a highly interdependent laboratory simulation to assess the differential impact that individual differences have on the initial status (i.e., intercept) and change (i.e., slope) in cohesion over time. Growth curve modeling results suggest support for our predictions that different individual differences uniquely predict the intercepts and slopes of task and social cohesion. Implications for the composition and intervention of teams are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 766
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[71]   The Team Personality-Team Performance Relationship Revisited: The Impact of Criterion Choice, Pattern of Workflow, and Method of Aggregation [J].
Prewett, Matthew S. ;
Walvoord, Ashley A. G. ;
Stilson, Frederick R. B. ;
Rossi, Michael E. ;
Brannick, Michael T. .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2009, 22 (04) :273-296
[72]  
Raudenbush S.W., 2011, HLM statistical software: Version 7. Computer software
[73]   Too close for comfort? Distinguishing between team intimacy and team cohesion [J].
Rosh, Lisa ;
Offermann, Lynn R. ;
Van Diest, Rhonda .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 22 (02) :116-127
[74]  
Salas E., 2015, Team cohesion: Advances in psychological theory, methods and practice
[75]   On teams, teamwork, and team performance: Discoveries and developments [J].
Salas, Eduardo ;
Cooke, Nancy J. ;
Rosen, Michael A. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2008, 50 (03) :540-547
[76]   Measuring Team Cohesion: Observations from the Science [J].
Salas, Eduardo ;
Grossman, Rebecca ;
Hughes, Ashley M. ;
Coultas, Chris W. .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2015, 57 (03) :365-374
[77]   Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling [J].
Scherbaum, Charles A. ;
Ferreter, Jennifer M. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 12 (02) :347-367
[78]   Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration [J].
Scribner, Jay Paredes ;
Sawyer, R. Keith ;
Watson, Sheldon T. ;
Myers, Vicki L. .
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 2007, 43 (01) :67-100
[79]   DEVELOPING, SUSTAINING, AND MAXIMIZING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: AN INTEGRATIVE, DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE OF TEAM DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTIONS [J].
Shuffler, Marissa L. ;
Diazgranados, Deborah ;
Maynard, M. Travis ;
Salas, Eduardo .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (02) :688-724
[80]   There's a Science for That: Team Development Interventions in Organizations [J].
Shuffler, Marissa L. ;
DiazGranados, Deborah ;
Salas, Eduardo .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (06) :365-372