Built for unity: assessing the impact of team composition on team cohesion trajectories

被引:21
作者
Acton, Bryan P. [1 ]
Braun, Michael T. [2 ]
Foti, Roseanne J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Team cohesion; Team composition; Team personality; Growth curve modeling; GOAL ORIENTATION; 5-FACTOR MODEL; THIN SLICES; PERFORMANCE; PERSONALITY; DYNAMICS; BEHAVIOR; ATTRACTION; POWER; TIME;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-019-09654-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Team cohesion is a critical factor for team effectiveness. Cohesion is a dynamic emergent state, demonstrating important changes as a function of the interactions among team members. Given the important role of individual differences for impacting the quality of social interactions as well as the resulting appraisals of individuals, it is not surprising that a plethora of studies find significant relationships between team composition and team cohesion. Unfortunately, knowledge of how individual difference composition influences changes in cohesion over time is still lacking. Therefore, drawing on theories on the development of interpersonal relationships, we tested predictions regarding the role of team personality and goal orientation for shaping the longitudinal trajectories of social and task cohesion. More specifically, we used a highly interdependent laboratory simulation to assess the differential impact that individual differences have on the initial status (i.e., intercept) and change (i.e., slope) in cohesion over time. Growth curve modeling results suggest support for our predictions that different individual differences uniquely predict the intercepts and slopes of task and social cohesion. Implications for the composition and intervention of teams are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 766
页数:16
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Time: A new research lens [J].
Ancona, DG ;
Goodman, PS ;
Lawrence, BS ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (04) :645-663
[2]   Complexity theory and organization science [J].
Anderson, P .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (03) :216-232
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203879962
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
[5]   Personality effects on social relationships [J].
Asendorpf, JB ;
Wilpers, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (06) :1531-1544
[6]   A Closer Look at First Sight: Social Relations Lens Model Analysis of Personality and Interpersonal Attraction at Zero Acquaintance [J].
Back, Mitja D. ;
Schmukle, Stefan C. ;
Egloff, Boris .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2011, 25 (03) :225-238
[7]   Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Neubert, MJ ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (03) :377-391
[8]   Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality [J].
Barry, B ;
Stewart, GL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (01) :62-78
[9]   Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations [J].
Beal, DJ ;
Cohen, RR ;
Burke, MJ ;
McLendon, CL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (06) :989-1004
[10]   Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Bell, Suzanne T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (03) :595-615