Enhancing Autonomy in Biobank Decisions: Too Much of a Good Thing?

被引:4
|
作者
Mitchell, Phoebe B. [1 ]
Ziniel, Sonja I. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Savage, Sarah K. [6 ]
Christensen, Kurt D. [7 ]
Weitzman, Elissa R. [7 ,8 ]
Green, Robert C. [7 ,11 ]
Huntington, Noelle L. [7 ,9 ]
Mathews, Debra J. [2 ]
Holm, Ingrid A. [7 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Ctr Patient Safety & Qual Res, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Pediat, Aurora, CO USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Facial Dysmorphol Anal Inc, Boston, MA USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Boston Childrens Hosp, Adolescent Young Adult Med & Informat, Boston, MA USA
[9] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[10] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[11] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Res Program Translat Genom & Hlth Outcomes G2P, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
biorepositories/biobanks; genetic research; return of results; bioethics; children and adolescent/pediatrics; GENETIC RISK-ASSESSMENT; GENOMIC RESEARCH; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; ALZHEIMER-DISEASE; RETURN; PARTICIPANTS; COHORT; PREFERENCES; INFORMATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1177/1556264617753483
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The opportunity to receive individual research results (IRRs) in accordance with personal preferences may incentivize biobank participation and maximize perceived benefit. This trial investigated the relationship between parents' preferences and intent to participate (ITP) in biobank research utilizing their child's genetic information. We randomized parents of pediatric patients to four hypothetical biobanks, one of which employed a preference-setting model for return of results regarding their child. ITP was highest among those desiring all types of IRRs (93.3%) and decreased as participants became increasingly selective with their preferences (p < .0001). We demonstrated that most parents would participate in a biobank that allows for preference setting; however, those who set preferences to receive a narrower set of IRRs are less likely to participate.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Calcium: Too Much of a Good Thing?
    Millstine, Denise
    Bergstrom, Larry
    Mayer, Anita P.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 22 (11) : 997 - 999
  • [2] Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing
    J. Michael Dunn
    Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2010, 39 : 425 - 452
  • [3] Contradictory Information: Too Much of a Good Thing
    Dunn, J. Michael
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2010, 39 (04) : 425 - 452
  • [4] Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice
    Lenton, Alison P.
    Francesconi, Marco
    BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 7 (04) : 528 - 531
  • [5] Too much of a good thing? Longer ballots reduce voter participation
    Cunow, Saul
    Desposato, Scott
    Janusz, Andrew
    Sells, Cameron
    JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2024, 34 (04) : 606 - 623
  • [6] Experience, experience, experience: Too much of a good thing for executive performance
    Hahn, Huh-Jung
    Kim, Sungjun
    HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2022, 33 (01) : 11 - 28
  • [7] Too much of a good thing? Mandatory risk disclosure and corporate innovation
    Au, Shiu-Yik
    Tan, Hongping
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2025, 50
  • [8] Too much of a good thing? The unforeseen cost of tags in online retailing
    Sepehri, Amir
    Duclos, Rod
    Haghighi, Nasir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2022, 39 (02) : 336 - 348
  • [9] Too much of a good thing? A theory of short-term debt as a sorting device
    Koenig, Philipp Johann
    Pothier, David
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2016, 26 : 100 - 114
  • [10] Too much of a good thing? Network brokerage within and between regions and innovation performance
    Operti, Elisa
    Kumar, Amit
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (02) : 300 - 316