Progression of Alzheimer's disease as measured by Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores

被引:94
作者
Williams, Monique M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Storandt, Martha [1 ,4 ]
Roe, Catherine M. [1 ,5 ]
Morris, John C. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Charles F & Joanne Knight Alzheimers Dis Res Ctr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Med, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Dept Neurol, St Louis, MO USA
[6] Washington Univ, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO USA
[7] Washington Univ, Program Phys Therapy, St Louis, MO USA
[8] Washington Univ, Program Occupat Therapy, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; Assessment of dementia; Clinical Dementia Rating; Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes; Cohort studies;
D O I
10.1016/j.jalz.2012.01.005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study examined rates of dementia progression as ascertained by the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) for symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (sAD), and assessed participant characteristics as predictors of CDR-SB progression. Methods: Participants (n = 792) were enrolled in longitudinal studies at an Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, received a diagnosis of sAD with a global CDR of 0.5 (n = 466) or 1 (n = 326), and had at least one follow-up assessment. Progression in CDR-SB over time as a function of baseline global CDR was examined. Results: A longitudinal increase (P <.0001) in CDR-SB was observed. The annual rate of change in CDR-SB scores was 1.43 (standard error [SE] = 0.05) in the CDR 0.5 sample and 1.91 (SE = 0.07) in the CDR 1 sample. For participants followed from the beginning of the CDR stage, time to progression to a higher global CDR was longer for individuals who were CDR 0.5 (3.75 years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.18-4.33) than those who were CDR 1 at baseline (2.98 years; 95% CI: 2.75-3.22). In the total CDR 0.5 sample, the significant predictors of progression to the next global CDR stage (P < .01) were age at first sAD diagnosis and apolipoprotein E4 genotype. Conclusions: The study findings are relevant to sAD clinical trial design and accurate, reliable ascertainment of the effect of disease-modifying treatments. (C) 2013 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S39 / S44
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Clinical core of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative: Progress and plans [J].
Aisen, Paul S. ;
Petersen, Ronald C. ;
Donohue, Michael C. ;
Gamst, Anthony ;
Raman, Rema ;
Thomas, Ronald G. ;
Walter, Sarah ;
Trojanowski, John Q. ;
Shaw, Leslie M. ;
Beckett, Laurel A. ;
Jack, Clifford R., Jr. ;
Jagust, William ;
Toga, Arthur W. ;
Saykin, Andrew J. ;
Morris, John C. ;
Green, Robert C. ;
Weiner, Michael W. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2010, 6 (03) :239-246
[2]   The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease [J].
Albert, Marilyn S. ;
DeKosky, Steven T. ;
Dickson, Dennis ;
Dubois, Bruno ;
Feldman, Howard H. ;
Fox, Nick C. ;
Gamst, Anthony ;
Holtzman, David M. ;
Jagust, William J. ;
Petersen, Ronald C. ;
Snyder, Peter J. ;
Carrillo, Maria C. ;
Thies, Bill ;
Phelps, Creighton H. .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2011, 7 (03) :270-279
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT PSYCHOGERIATR
[4]   MILD SENILE DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER TYPE .4. EVALUATION OF INTERVENTION [J].
BERG, L ;
MILLER, JP ;
BATY, J ;
RUBIN, EH ;
MORRIS, JC ;
FIGIEL, G .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 31 (03) :242-249
[5]   Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer disease - Relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apolipoprotein E genotype [J].
Berg, L ;
McKeel, DW ;
Miller, JP ;
Storandt, M ;
Rubin, EH ;
Morris, JC ;
Baty, J ;
Coats, M ;
Norton, J ;
Goate, AM ;
Price, JL ;
Gearing, M ;
Mirra, SS ;
Saunders, AM .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1998, 55 (03) :326-335
[6]   RELIABILITY OF THE WASHINGTON-UNIVERSITY CLINICAL DEMENTIA RATING [J].
BURKE, WJ ;
MILLER, JP ;
RUBIN, EH ;
MORRIS, JC ;
COBEN, LA ;
DUCHEK, J ;
WITTELS, IG ;
BERG, L .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1988, 45 (01) :31-32
[7]   Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials [J].
Coley, Nicola ;
Andrieu, Sandrine ;
Jaros, Mark ;
Weiner, Michael ;
Cedarbaum, Jesse ;
Vellas, Bruno .
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2011, 7 (06) :602-610
[8]   APOE ε4 allele predicts faster cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer disease [J].
Cosentino, S. ;
Scarmeas, N. ;
Helzner, E. ;
Glymour, M. M. ;
Brandt, J. ;
Albert, M. ;
Blacker, D. ;
Stern, Y. .
NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (19) :1842-1849
[9]  
Dreyfus DM, 2010, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V67, P862, DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2010.145
[10]   Effectiveness and Tolerability of High-Dose (23 mg/d) Versus Standard-Dose (10 mg/d) Donepezil in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease: A 24-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind Study [J].
Farlow, Martin R. ;
Salloway, Stephen ;
Tariot, Pierre N. ;
Yardley, Jane ;
Moline, Margaret L. ;
Wang, Qin ;
Brand-Schieber, Elimor ;
Zou, Heng ;
Hsu, Timothy ;
Satlin, Andrew .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (07) :1234-1251