QoS routing in multi-domain networks

被引:0
作者
Benmohamed, L [1 ]
Doshi, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
来源
2005 IEEE PACIFIC RIM CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (PACRIM) | 2005年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0809 ;
摘要
With increasing number of mission critical applications and associated traffic volume on commercial and DoD IP networks, it is becoming increasingly critical for the network infrastructure to be more aware of the Quality of Service (in a broad sense of the word) requirements and use this awareness in routing, differential treatment of packets, in management-level resource provisioning and allocation. In this paper, we focus on the implication of these requirements on the routing architecture and protocols. In particular, we argue that the inter domain routing protocols like the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and its integration with the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) need to account for the diversity in the QoS requirements of the applications, users, and mission. The solution we suggest involves allowing multiple inter-AS routes for the same source destination pair, propagation of multiple routes, and of multiple QoS-affecting metrics in the BGP UPDATE messages. These enhancements allow routes to be matched with application requirements and hence allow satisfaction of applications QoS requirements at minimal cost. In order to keep the solution scalable, we limit the propagation of information to non-dominated routes, and design a small set of QoS metrics. Details of the protocols and quantitative analysis will be presented in future papers. Our approach, along with IntServe and DiffServe based QoS capabilities, and traffic engineering extensions of intra domain routing protocols, will provide a framework for end-to-end QoS-aware networking.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 140
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] AWDUCHE, 2001, 3209 IETF RFC
  • [2] Blake Steven, 1998, 2475 IETF RFC
  • [3] Braden R., 1997, ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP)-IETF RFC 2205
  • [4] BRADEN R, 1994, 1633 IETF RFC
  • [5] CRISTALLO, 2004, UNPUB IETF
  • [6] DUMORTIER P, 1998, IEEE COMM MAGAZI JAN, P82
  • [7] HAO, 2000, P IEEE INF 2000 MARC
  • [8] KATZ KK, 2003, 3630 RFC
  • [9] Routing with topology aggregation in delay-bandwidth sensitive networks
    Lui, KS
    Nahrstedt, K
    Chen, SG
    [J]. IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2004, 12 (01) : 17 - 29
  • [10] SMIT H, 2004, 3784 RFC