Material deprivation in the EU: A multi-level analysis on the influence of decommodification and defamilisation policies

被引:22
作者
Israel, Sabine [1 ]
Spannagel, Dorothee [2 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Hans Bockler Stiftung, Wirtschafts & Sozialwissensch Inst, Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Material deprivation; poverty; welfare states; decommodification; defamilisation EU-SILC; multi-level analysis; 18 OECD COUNTRIES; INCOME POVERTY; WELFARE; EMPLOYMENT; REGIMES; WORLDS;
D O I
10.1177/0001699318778735
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The central aim of this paper is identifying the existing political leeway for the reduction of deprivation levels in Europe. The links between household and individual characteristics and risks of material deprivation have been abundantly researched, but what are the political institutions that modify and possibly buffer these odds? Welfare state differences have been portrayed in depth but their association with social outcomes such as deprivation is less clear. By identifying the impact of decommodification and defamilisation policies on deprivation exposure, we seek to fill this gap. Our results, based on European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions 2012 to 2013 cross-sectional micro data, reveal that social programmes that cover large segments of the population and follow a needs-based approach are linked to lower odds of being materially deprived. A significant number of European cross-country differences in deprivation rates can thus be traced back to varying levels of social assistance, as well as to differences in the provision of public healthcare. Defamilisation policies are, despite increased risks for (single parent) families, not yet addressing the problem of low living standards successfully. An extension of childcare services, however, seems promising for lowering deprivation among families, particularly in countries with high levels of involuntary part-time work.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 173
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ROUTLEGDE HDB WELFAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], INCOME LIVING CONDIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, MEASURING MAT DEPRIV
[4]   Defamilisation and welfare state regimes: a cluster analysis [J].
Bambra, Clare .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (04) :326-338
[5]   Worlds of Welfare and the Health Care Discrepancy [J].
Bambra, Clare .
SOCIAL POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2005, 4 (01) :31-41
[6]  
Bambra Clare., 2004, Social Policy Society, V3, P201, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S147474640400171X, https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474640400171X]
[7]   No claim, no pain. Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data [J].
Bargain, Olivier ;
Immervoll, Herwig ;
Viitamaki, Heikki .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2012, 10 (03) :375-395
[8]   Comparing nested models and interpreting results from logit and probit regression [J].
Best, Henning ;
Wolf, Christof .
KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2012, 64 (02) :377-395
[9]  
Cameron A.Colin., 2010, Microeconomics Using Stata: Revised Edition