Is the New AquaTrainer® Snorkel Valid for VO2 Assessment in Swimming?

被引:48
作者
Baldari, C. [1 ]
Fernandes, R. J. [2 ,3 ]
Meucci, M. [1 ]
Ribeiro, J. [2 ]
Vilas-Boas, J. P. [2 ,3 ]
Guidetti, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Foro Ital, Dept Hlth Sci, I-00135 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Sport, Ctr Res Educ Innovat & Intervent Sport, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Porto Biomech Lab, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
respiratory valves; K4b(2); oxygen consumption; energetics; OXYGEN-UPTAKE MEASUREMENTS; FRONT CRAWL; RESPIRATORY VALVE; TELEMETRY SYSTEM; GAS-ANALYSIS; EXERCISE; RELIABILITY; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1321804
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The Cosmed AquaTrainer (R) snorkel, in connection with the K4b(2) analyzer, is the most recent instrument used for real time gas analysis during swimming. This study aimed to test if a new AquaTrainer (R) snorkel with 2 (SV2) or 4 (SV4) valves is comparable to a standard face mask (Mask) being valid for real time gas analysis under controlled laboratory and swimming pool conditions. 9 swimmers performed 2 swimming and 3 cycling tests at 3 different workloads on separate days. Tests were performed in random order, at constant exercise load with direct turbine temperature measurements, breathing with Mask, SV4 and SV2 while cycling, and with SV2 and SV4 while swimming. A high agreement was obtained using Passing - Bablok regression analysis in oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, tidal volumes, pulmonary ventilation, expiratory fraction of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and heart rate comparing different conditions in swimming and cycling. Proportional and fixed differences were always rejected (95 % CI always contained the value 1 for the slope and the 0 for the intercept). In conclusion, the new SV2 AquaTrainer (R) snorkel, can be considered a valid device for gas analysis, being comparable to the Mask and the SV4 in cycling, and to the SV4 in swimming.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 344
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Armstrong L, 2006, ACSMS GUIDELINES EXE, P73
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Letter to the editor of EJAP [J].
Brugnoli, Paolo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 110 (04) :875-876
[4]  
CRANDALL CG, 1994, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V26, P108
[5]   A NEW RESPIRATORY VALVE SYSTEM FOR MEASURING OXYGEN-UPTAKE DURING SWIMMING [J].
DALMONTE, A ;
SARDELLA, F ;
ALIPPI, B ;
FAINA, M ;
MANETTA, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (02) :159-162
[6]  
DIPRAMPE.PE, 1974, J APPL PHYSIOL, V37, P1
[7]  
Douglas C.G., 1911, Journal of Physiology, V42, P17
[8]   Field testing of VO2peak in cross-country skiers with portable breath-by-breath system [J].
Doyon, KH ;
Perrey, S ;
Abe, D ;
Hughson, RL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2001, 26 (01) :1-11
[9]   Accuracy and reliabillity of a Cosmed K4b2 portable gas analysis system [J].
Duffield, R ;
Dawson, B ;
Pinnington, H ;
Wong, P .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2004, 7 (01) :11-22
[10]   Step Length and Individual Anaerobic Threshold Assessment in Swimming [J].
Fernandes, R. J. ;
Sousa, M. ;
Machado, L. ;
Vilas-Boas, J. P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 32 (12) :940-946