Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness?

被引:79
作者
Larsen, Frank Wugt [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bladt, Jesper [4 ,5 ]
Balmford, Andrew [2 ]
Rahbek, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Dept Biol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Cambridge, Conservat Sci Grp, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[3] Conservat Int, Sci & Knowledge Div, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[4] Aarhus Univ, Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Biodivers, DK-8410 Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Ecoinformat & Biodivers Grp, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biodiversity; birds; complementarity; conservation; conservation planning; indicators; surrogacy; IDENTIFYING PRIORITY AREAS; INDICATOR GROUPS; RESERVE SELECTION; CONSERVATION; COMPLEMENTARITY; PERFORMANCE; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02094.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. Most biodiversity is still unknown, and therefore, priority areas for conservation typically are identified based on the presence of surrogates, or indicator groups. Birds are commonly used as surrogates of biodiversity owing to the wide availability of relevant data and their broad popular appeal. However, some studies have found birds to perform relatively poorly as indicators. We therefore ask how the effectiveness of this approach can be improved by supplementing data on birds with information on other taxa. 2. Here, we explore two strategies using (i) species data for other taxa and (ii) genus-and familylevel data for invertebrates (when available). We used three distinct species data sets for subSaharan Africa, Denmark and Uganda, which cover different spatial scales, biogeographic regions and taxa (vertebrates, invertebrates and plants). 3. We found that networks of priority areas identified on the basis of birds alone performed well in representing overall species diversity where birds were relatively speciose compared to the other taxa in the data sets. Adding species data for one taxon increased surrogate effectiveness better than adding genus-and family-level data. It became apparent that, while adding species data for other taxa increased overall effectiveness, predicting the best-performing additional taxon was difficult. Finally, we demonstrate that increasing overall effectiveness required supplementary data for several additional taxa. 4. Synthesis and applications. Good surrogates of biodiversity are necessary to help identify conservation areas that will be effective in preventing species extinctions. Birds perform fairly well as surrogates in cases where birds are relatively speciose, but overall effectiveness will be improved by adding additional data fromother taxa, in particular fromrange-restricted species. Conservation solutions with focus on birds as biodiversity surrogate could therefore benefit from also incorporating species data from other taxa.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 356
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiverse group: the macrofungi [J].
Balmford, A ;
Lyon, AJE ;
Lang, RM .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 93 (02) :209-217
[2]  
BirdLife International, 2010, STAT WORLDS BIRDS
[3]   Does taxonomic diversity in indicator groups influence their effectiveness in identifying priority areas for species conservation? [J].
Bladt, J. ;
Larsen, F. W. ;
Rahbek, C. .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 11 (06) :546-554
[4]  
Brown J.H., 1998, Biogeography
[5]  
Burgess N, 1998, SPECIES, V30, P16
[6]   How much of the vertebrate diversity of sub-Saharan Africa is catered for by recent conservation proposals? [J].
Burgess, ND ;
Rahbek, C ;
Larsen, FW ;
Williams, P ;
Balmford, A .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 107 (03) :327-339
[7]   Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines [J].
Butchart, Stuart H. M. ;
Walpole, Matt ;
Collen, Ben ;
van Strien, Arco ;
Scharlemann, Joern P. W. ;
Almond, Rosamunde E. A. ;
Baillie, Jonathan E. M. ;
Bomhard, Bastian ;
Brown, Claire ;
Bruno, John ;
Carpenter, Kent E. ;
Carr, Genevieve M. ;
Chanson, Janice ;
Chenery, Anna M. ;
Csirke, Jorge ;
Davidson, Nick C. ;
Dentener, Frank ;
Foster, Matt ;
Galli, Alessandro ;
Galloway, James N. ;
Genovesi, Piero ;
Gregory, Richard D. ;
Hockings, Marc ;
Kapos, Valerie ;
Lamarque, Jean-Francois ;
Leverington, Fiona ;
Loh, Jonathan ;
McGeoch, Melodie A. ;
McRae, Louise ;
Minasyan, Anahit ;
Morcillo, Monica Hernandez ;
Oldfield, Thomasina E. E. ;
Pauly, Daniel ;
Quader, Suhel ;
Revenga, Carmen ;
Sauer, John R. ;
Skolnik, Benjamin ;
Spear, Dian ;
Stanwell-Smith, Damon ;
Stuart, Simon N. ;
Symes, Andy ;
Tierney, Megan ;
Tyrrell, Tristan D. ;
Vie, Jean-Christophe ;
Watson, Reg .
SCIENCE, 2010, 328 (5982) :1164-1168
[8]   Top predators: hot or not? A call for systematic assessment of biodiversity surrogates [J].
Cabeza, Mar ;
Arponen, Anni ;
Van Teeffelen, Astrid .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2008, 45 (03) :976-980
[9]   Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem [J].
Church, RL ;
Stoms, DM ;
Davis, FW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (02) :105-112
[10]   The relevance of systematics in choosing priority areas for global conservation [J].
Fjeldså, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 27 (01) :67-75