Comparison of the 3-phase segmented linear regression and artificial neural network models to predict broiler hatchability

被引:4
|
作者
Chamsaz, M. [1 ]
Perai, A. H. [2 ,3 ]
Asadpour, S. [1 ]
Shahidi, R. Hosseini [4 ]
机构
[1] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Agr, Excellence Ctr Anim Sci Res, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, Garmsar Branch, Dept Vet Med, Garmsar, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH | 2011年 / 20卷 / 04期
关键词
age; artificial neural network; broiler breeder; hatchability; 3-phase segmented linear regression model; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3382/japr.2010-00249
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) model and a 3-phase segmented linear regression model to describe the relationship between flock age and hatchability in broiler breeder flocks. The predictive quality of these models was tested for an external validation set of 14 wk, randomly chosen from 39 wk. The accuracy of the models was determined by the r(2) value, mean square error, bias, and Theil's U-statistic parameters. The r(2) values of the 3-phase segmented linear regression and ANN models were 0.4003 and 0.9984, respectively. Therefore, the ANN produced more accurate predictions of hatchability than the 3-phase segmented linear regression model. We conclude, based on the results of this study in commercial broiler breeder flocks, that hatchability is a function of flock age and that the relationship can be described by an ANN model.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Comparison of artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models to predict optimum bonding strength of heat treated woods
    Tiryaki, Sebahattin
    Ozsahin, Sukru
    Yildirim, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2014, 55 : 29 - 36
  • [3] Comparison of Artificial Neural Network Models and Multiple Linear Regression Models in Cargo Port Performance Prediction
    Jayaprakash, P. Oliver
    Gunasekaran, K.
    Muralidharan, S.
    MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3570 - +
  • [4] Comparison of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models of Egg Production
    Wang, B. Y.
    Chen, S. A.
    Roan, S. W.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2012, 11 (14): : 2503 - 2508
  • [5] Egg hatchability prediction by multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
    Bolzan, A. C.
    Machado, R. A. F.
    Piaia, J. C. Z.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2008, 10 (02) : 97 - 102
  • [6] Application of Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network for Broiler Chicken Growth Performance Prediction
    Ghazanfari, S.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 4 (02): : 411 - 416
  • [7] Comparison of Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for the Dimensional Control of the Welded Stamped Steel Arms
    Kadnar, Milan
    Kacer, Peter
    Harnicarova, Marta
    Valicek, Jan
    Toth, Frantisek
    Bujna, Marian
    Kusnerova, Milena
    Mikus, Rastislav
    Borzan, Marian
    MACHINES, 2023, 11 (03)
  • [8] Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models Goodness of Fit to Lactation Milk Yields
    Takma, Cigdem
    Atil, Hulya
    Aksakal, Vecihi
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2012, 18 (06) : 941 - 944
  • [9] A Critical Comparison of Regression Models and Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Ground Vibrations
    Ram Chandar K.
    Sastry V.R.
    Hegde C.
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2017, 35 (2) : 573 - 583
  • [10] Comparison of artificial neural network and regression models in software effort estimation
    de Barcelos Tronto, Iris Fabiana
    Simoes da Silva, Jose Demisio
    Anna, Nilson Sant'
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-6, 2007, : 771 - 776