Gastrointestinal perforations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Sweden: a nationwide cohort study

被引:10
作者
Barbulescu, Andrei [1 ]
Delcoigne, Benedicte [1 ]
Askling, Johan [1 ]
Frisell, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
RMD OPEN | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Rheumatoid Arthritis; Treatment; DMARDs (biologic); Epidemiology; INVERSE PROBABILITY; RISK; TOCILIZUMAB; REGISTER; POPULATION; VALIDATION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001201
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare incidence rates of gastrointestinal (GI) perforations between patients with RA and the general population, and between patients treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologics. Methods In this nationwide cohort study, a total of 63 532 patients with RA, with 26 050 biological treatment episodes (TNFi, rituximab, abatacept or tocilizumab) and 76 304 general population controls, were followed between 2009 and 2017 until the first outcome event. The main outcome was hospitalisation or death due to lower GI perforations, identified according to a prespecified list of ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) codes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for adjustment. Results The sex-standardised and age-standardised incidence rates of lower GI perforations were 1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3) events per 1000 person-years among general population controls, 1.6 (1.5-1.7) among bionaive patients and ranged from 1.8 (1.4-3.6) (TNFi) to 4.5 (2.7-10.4) (tocilizumab) among biologics-treated patients. After adjustment for glucocorticoid use, the risk in bionaive, TNFi-treated, abatacept-treated or rituximab-treated patients with RA was no longer different from the general population, while for tocilizumab it remained significantly higher. Comparing tocilizumab to TNFi, the adjusted HR for lower GI perforations was 2.2 (1.3-3.8), corresponding to one additional GI perforation per 451 patient-years treated with tocilizumab instead of TNFi. Conclusion Tocilizumab was associated with a higher risk of lower GI perforations compared with alternative biologics. In absolute numbers, the risk remained low on all biologics commonly used to treat RA, but the accumulated evidence across settings and outcome definitions supports that this risk should be considered in treatment guidelines for RA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk for malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs compared to the general population: A nationwide cohort study in Japan
    Harigai, Masayoshi
    Nanki, Toshihiro
    Koike, Ryuji
    Tanaka, Michi
    Watanabe-Imai, Kaori
    Komano, Yukiko
    Sakai, Ryoko
    Yamazaki, Hayato
    Koike, Takao
    Miyasaka, Nobuyuki
    MODERN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 26 (05) : 642 - 650
  • [2] Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Danish Cohort Study
    Abtahi, Shahab
    Cordtz, Rene
    Dreyer, Lene
    Driessen, Johanna H. M.
    Boonen, Annelies
    Burden, Andrea M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2022, 135 (07) : 879 - +
  • [3] Use of healthcare resources in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib
    Machado-Alba, Jorge Enrique
    Machado-Duque, Manuel E.
    Gaviria-Mendoza, Andres
    Reyes, Juan Manuel
    Gamboa, Natalia Castano
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 40 (04) : 1273 - 1281
  • [4] Use of healthcare resources in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or tofacitinib
    Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
    Manuel E. Machado-Duque
    Andres Gaviria-Mendoza
    Juan Manuel Reyes
    Natalia Castaño Gamboa
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2021, 40 : 1273 - 1281
  • [5] Comparative cardiovascular safety with janus kinase inhibitors and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs as used in clinical practice: an observational cohort study from Sweden in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Bower, Hannah
    Frisell, Thomas
    di Giuseppe, Daniela
    Delcoigne, Benedicte
    Askling, Johan
    RMD OPEN, 2023, 9 (04):
  • [6] Safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
    Martinez-Mugica, Cristina
    Salgueiro, Esther
    FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA, 2022, 46 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [7] Predictors at diagnosis for start of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study
    Hameed, Mohaned
    Exarchou, Sofia
    Eberhard, Anna
    Sharma, Ankita
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Cagnotto, Giovanni
    Einarsson, Jon Thorkell
    Turesson, Carl
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [8] Nationwide prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis and penetration of disease-modifying drugs in Sweden
    Neovius, Martin
    Simard, Julia F.
    Askling, Johan
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2011, 70 (04) : 624 - 629
  • [9] Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with targeted synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: A multi-centre cohort study
    Tong, Xinning
    Shen, Chin-Yao
    Jeon, Ha-Lim
    Li, Yihua
    Shin, Ju-Young
    Chan, Shirley C. W.
    Yiu, Kai Hang
    Pratt, Nicole L.
    Ward, Michael
    Lau, Chak Sing
    Wong, Ian C. K.
    Li, Xue
    Lai, Edward Chia-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 294 (03) : 314 - 325
  • [10] The Efficacy of Biological Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Sarcopenia in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Hasegawa, Eriko
    Ito, Satoshi
    Kurosawa, Yoichi
    Kobayashi, Daisuke
    Otani, Hiroshi
    Abe, Asami
    Nakazono, Kiyoshi
    Murasawa, Akira
    Narita, Ichiei
    Ishikawa, Hajime
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 62 (03) : 373 - 379