共 50 条
Comparing the association of GFR estimated by the CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations and mortality: the third national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES III)
被引:36
作者:
Shafi, Tariq
[1
,2
]
Matsushita, Kunihiro
[2
,3
]
Selvin, Elizabeth
[2
,3
]
Sang, Yingying
[2
,3
]
Astor, Brad C.
[4
]
Inker, Lesley A.
[5
]
Coresh, Josef
[2
,3
,6
]
机构:
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Welch Ctr Prevent Epidemiol & Clin Res, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI USA
[5] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Boston, MA USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
来源:
BMC NEPHROLOGY
|
2012年
/
13卷
关键词:
Glomerular filtration rate;
Chronic kidney disease;
Epidemiology;
Outcomes;
GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE;
SERUM CREATININE;
RENAL-DISEASE;
RISK-FACTORS;
MARKER;
LIMITATIONS;
DIET;
D O I:
10.1186/1471-2369-13-42
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR(CKD-EPI)) improves GFR estimation compared with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation (eGFR(MDRD)) but its association with mortality in a nationally representative population sample in the US has not been studied. Methods: We examined the association between eGFR and mortality among 16,010 participants of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Primary predictors were eGFR(CKD-EPI) and eGFR(MDRD). Outcomes of interest were all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Improvement in risk categorization with eGFR(CKD-EPI) was evaluated using adjusted relative hazard (HR) and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). Results: Overall, 26.9% of the population was reclassified to higher eGFR categories and 2.2% to lower eGFR categories by eGFR(CKD-EPI), reducing the proportion of prevalent CKD classified as stage 3-5 from 45.6% to 28.8%. There were 3,620 deaths (1,540 from CVD) during 215,082 person-years of follow-up (median, 14.3 years). Among those with eGFR(MDRD) 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 19.4% were reclassified to eGFR(CKD-EPI) 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and these individuals had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.84) and CVD mortality (adjusted HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27-0.96) compared with those not reclassified. Among those with eGFR(MDRD) >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), 0.5% were reclassified to lower eGFR(CKD-EPI) and these individuals had a higher risk of all-cause (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01-1.69) and CVD (adjusted HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-1.99) mortality compared with those not reclassified. Risk prediction improved with eGFR(CKD-EPI); NRI was 0.21 for all-cause mortality (p < 0.001) and 0.22 for CVD mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusions: eGFR(CKD-EPI) categories improve mortality risk stratification of individuals in the US population. If eGFR(CKD-EPI) replaces eGFR(MDRD) in the US, it will likely improve risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文