THE EFFECT OF WORKING MEMORY CAPACITY AND MENTAL EFFORT ON MONITORING ACCURACY IN TEXT COMPREHENSION

被引:3
作者
Ikeda, Kenji [1 ]
Kitagami, Shinji [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Psychol, Grad Sch Environm Studies, Chikusa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
关键词
Monitoring accuracy; Working memory; Mental effort; IMPROVE METACOMPREHENSION ACCURACY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CONSTRAINTS; PREDICTIONS; CALIBRATION; RETRIEVAL; JUDGMENTS; ABSOLUTE; MODEL; EASE;
D O I
10.2117/psysoc.2012.184
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated the effect of working memory capacity and mental effort on the ability to monitor the accuracy of text comprehension. Participants completed the operation span test to measure working memory capacity (WMC) and read five scientific expository texts. In low-effort condition, participants read intact texts, whereas in high-effort condition, participants read texts that had some letters deleted. After reading, participants assigned comprehension rating to each text and then completed a comprehension test. The result showed a significant interaction between WMC and mental effort. Increased effort improved the accuracy of low-WMC readers but decreased the accuracy of high-WMC readers. Further, in low-effort condition, high-WMC readers monitored their comprehension more accurately than did low-WMC readers. In high-effort condition, low-WMC readers monitored their comprehension more accurately than did high-WMC readers. Our findings showed that both WMC and mental effort affected the ability of participants to monitor their accuracy. These findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy? [J].
Anderson, Mary C. M. ;
Thiede, Keith W. .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 128 (01) :110-118
[2]   WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AS LONG-TERM-MEMORY ACTIVATION - AN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH [J].
CANTOR, J ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1101-1114
[3]   Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Bunting, MF ;
Hambrick, DZ ;
Wilhelm, O ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) :769-786
[4]   WORKING-MEMORY AND RETRIEVAL - A RESOURCE-DEPENDENT INHIBITION MODEL [J].
CONWAY, ARA ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1994, 123 (04) :354-373
[5]   Why does rereading improve metacomprehension accuracy? Evaluating the levels-of-disruption hypothesis for the rereading effect [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2005, 40 (01) :37-55
[6]   What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Rawson, KA ;
Middleton, EL .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (04) :551-565
[7]   Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study [J].
Dunlosky, J ;
Thiede, KW .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (05) :779-788
[8]   Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores [J].
Gonzalez, R ;
Nelson, TO .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 119 (01) :159-165
[9]   Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy [J].
Griffin, Thomas D. ;
Wiley, Jennifer ;
Thiede, Keith W. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (01) :93-103
[10]   A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity [J].
Kane, MJ ;
Bleckley, MK ;
Conway, ARA ;
Engle, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (02) :169-183