Assessing sustainable development in urban areas using cognitive mapping and MCDA

被引:44
作者
Fernandes, Ines D. S. [1 ]
Ferreira, Fernando A. F. [2 ,3 ]
Bento, Paulo [2 ]
Jalali, Marjan S. [2 ]
Antonio, Nelson J. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Inst Lisbon, ISCTE Business Sch, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Inst Lisbon, ISCTE Business Sch, BRU IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Memphis, Fogelman Coll Business & Econ, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Decision making; sustainability; sustainable development; prioritization of determinants; cognitive mapping; AHP; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION; INDICATORS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2017.1358221
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As interest in sustainability-related issues has increased over recent years, so too has urban sustainability risen to the fore, in academic, practitioner, and policymaking circles alike. Urban sustainability requires a balance between environmental concerns, the economy, and social development in urban areas. However, over the years, there has been an exponential increase in urban density, accompanied by increased economic activity and high levels of consumption, which have hindered urban planning and made the sustainable management of urban areas more difficult. It has therefore become increasingly necessary to combine the interests of the various stakeholders involved in - or affected by - urban planning measures, in order to achieve a balance between their needs, those of the environment and future generations, and the need for economic development. Sustainability evaluation models can in this sense be considered a baseline condition for sustainable development. However, most existing evaluation systems present limitations in terms of criteria identification and the calculation of the respective trade-offs. To address these issues, the current study aims to combine cognitive mapping and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize the determinants of sustainable development in urban areas. The advantages and limitations of our proposal are also analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Ackermann F, 2010, SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO MANAGING CHANGE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P135, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_4
[2]  
Barbosa G.S., 2014, INT J SOCIAL SCI, V3, P1, DOI [10.13073/FPJ-D-13-00090, DOI 10.13073/FPJ-D-13-00090]
[3]  
Beatley T., 1998, The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy, and community
[4]   Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes [J].
Bell, S. ;
Morse, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2013, 64 (07) :959-972
[5]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
[6]   Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans [J].
Berke, PR ;
Conroy, MM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (01) :21-33
[7]   Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review [J].
Bockstaller, Christian ;
Guichard, Laurence ;
Makowski, David ;
Aveline, Anne ;
Girardin, Philippe ;
Plantureux, Sylvain .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 28 (01) :139-149
[8]  
Bossel B, 1998, EARTH CROSSROADS PAT
[9]  
Brundtland Report, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE RE