From the Oncological Rehabilitation Clinic to the Place of Residence - Interface Analysis Considering Exercise Intervention

被引:0
作者
Wirtz, Petra [1 ,2 ]
Weber, Rabea [1 ]
Baumann, Freerk T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deutsch Sporthsch, Inst Kreislaufforsch & Sportmed, Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Univ Klinikum Koln, Ctr Integrierte Onkol Aachen Bonn Koln Dusseldorf, Klin Innere Med 1, Cologne, Germany
关键词
cooperation; cancer aftercare; physical activity; survivors; rehabilitation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; CANCER SURVIVORS; BREAST-CANCER; CARE;
D O I
10.1055/a-1125-6717
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose This study analyzes the transfer of knowledge and information of exercise and physical activity after cancer therapy in rehabilitation clinics and rehabilitative cancer sports groups in Germany. Moreover, the way of referral into rehabilitative cancer sports groups is evaluated. A possible cooperation between rehabilitation clinics and rehabilitative cancer sports groups is also examined. Methods A survey concept including 2 successive cross sectional analyses was applied using self-designed questionnaires. According to defined inclusion criteria oncological rehabilitation clinics were selected for the first survey (2015). Based on the results, the second survey (2018) was conducted within rehabilitative cancer sports groups using an online survey. Results 33 rehabilitation clinics with 44,828 patients treated (in 2014) as well as 126 cancer sports groups with 1,896 rehabilitative cancer sports group participants were included. 99 % of patients in rehabilitation clinics had been informed about exercise and physical activity in the aftercare. 18 % of the rehabilitative cancer sports groups were cooperating/in contact with oncological rehabilitation clinics, while 57 % of the rehabilitation clinics provided contact information of the rehabilitation sports groups leaders at the patients' hometown. 78 % of rehabilitation clinic patients received individual exercise recommendations for home-based exercise, while only 23 % of the rehabilitative cancer sports groups participants' had received those recommendations prior to participation in this groups, according to the cancer sports group leaders. Conclusion The results are diverse: The rehabilitative cancer sports groups participants present a lower level of information and opposing prescriptions compared to the patients in rehabilitation clinics, according to the responding clinics and groups. This could be due to the fact that most patients are referred to rehabilitative cancer sports groups by specialists and general practitioners, and only few of them attended a rehabilitation clinic before, where comprehensive information is available. The implementation of a nationwide network including rehabilitative cancer sports groups, rehabilitation clinics and specialists/general practitioners could optimize cancer care in terms of quality as well as quantity.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 222
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Basen-Engquist K, 2017, OBESITY SILVER SP S2, V25, P9
  • [2] Beyss D., 2017, THESIS
  • [3] Self-help Friendliness as an Element of Patient-centered Rehabilitation Results - of a Model Project
    Bobzien, M.
    Trojan, A.
    [J]. REHABILITATION, 2015, 54 (02) : 116 - 122
  • [4] Cancer Patients' Knowledge and Acceptance of Physical Activities for Rehabilitation
    Buentzel, Jens
    Kusterer, Irene
    Rudolph, Yvonne
    Kubin, Thomas
    Micke, Oliver
    Huebner, Jutta
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2017, 31 (06): : 1187 - 1192
  • [5] Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs
    Buffart, Laurien M.
    Kalter, Joeri
    Sweegers, Maike G.
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    Newton, Robert U.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Jacobsen, Paul B.
    May, Anne M.
    Galvao, Daniel A.
    Chinapaw, Mai J.
    Steindorf, Karen
    Irwin, Melinda L.
    Stuiver, Martijn M.
    Hayes, Sandi
    Griffith, Kathleen A.
    Lucia, Alejandro
    Mesters, Ilse
    van Weert, Ellen
    Knoop, Hans
    Goedendorp, Martine M.
    Mutrie, Nanette
    Daley, Amanda J.
    McConnachie, Alex
    Bohus, Martin
    Thorsen, Lene
    Schulz, Karl-Heinz
    Short, Camille E.
    James, Erica L.
    Plotnikoff, Ron C.
    Arbane, Gill
    Schmidt, Martina E.
    Potthoff, Karin
    van Beurden, Marc
    Oldenburg, Hester S.
    Sonke, Gabe S.
    van Harten, Wim H.
    Garrod, Rachel
    Schmitz, Kathryn H.
    Winters-Stone, Kerri M.
    Velthuis, Miranda J.
    Taaffe, Dennis R.
    van Mechelen, Willem
    Kersten, Marie Jose
    Nollet, Frans
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Wiskemann, Joachim
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    Brug, Johannes
    [J]. CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 52 : 91 - 104
  • [6] Reasons for the Non-Utilisation of an Oncological Rehabilitation. Results of a Written Survey with Patients of Oncological Healthcare Centers
    Deck, Ruth
    Babaev, Valentin
    Katalinic, Alexander
    [J]. REHABILITATION, 2019, 58 (04) : 243 - 252
  • [7] Conceptual Basis of Exercise Therapy in Medical Rehabilitation: Results of a National Survey in Germany
    Deprins, Judith
    Geidl, Wolfgang
    Streber, Rene
    Pfeifer, Klaus
    Sudeck, Gorden
    [J]. REHABILITATION, 2019, 58 (06) : 366 - 375
  • [8] Review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life in cancer survivors
    Duncan, Morvwen
    Moschopoulou, Elisavet
    Herrington, Eldrid
    Deane, Jennifer
    Roylance, Rebecca
    Jones, Louise
    Bourke, Liam
    Morgan, Adrienne
    Chalder, Trudie
    Thaha, Mohamed A.
    Taylor, Stephanie C.
    Korszun, Ania
    White, Peter D.
    Bhui, Kamaldeep
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (11):
  • [9] DGRW-Update: Patient Education
    Faller, H.
    Reusch, A.
    Meng, K.
    [J]. REHABILITATION, 2011, 50 (05) : 284 - 291
  • [10] Golla A., 2018, PHYS MED REHABIL KUR, V28, P241, DOI [10.1055/s-0038-1668265, DOI 10.1055/S-0038-1668265]