The free-rider deficit in the demand for farm animal welfare-labelled meat

被引:20
|
作者
Uehleke, Reinhard [1 ]
Huettel, Silke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Chair Prod Econ, Inst Food & Resource Econ, Bonn, Germany
关键词
animal welfare; food labelling; public goods; customer behaviour; stated preferences; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; HUSBANDRY SYSTEMS; CONSUMER LIKING; CHICKEN BREAST; PUBLIC-GOODS; PREFERENCES; MARKET; FOOD; ECONOMICS; BEEF;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jby025
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper examines the consumers' stated demand for a farm animal welfare label in Germany, where we contrast stated demand in an individual and a collective decision situation. Under the collective decision framing, we find significantly higher support rates for animal welfare-labelled products, indicating the possible existence of free-rider behaviour. In addition, we find determinants of the choice for labelled meat to differ: while normative demeanour is important in both frames, only in the individual purchase situation expected better taste is relatively more important than normative considerations about farm animal welfare. These findings question the success of such labels.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 318
页数:28
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Organic- and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same Consumers?
    Gerini, Francesca
    Alfnes, Frode
    Schjoll, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 67 (02) : 471 - 490
  • [2] Mexican consumers' perceptions and attitudes towards farm animal welfare and willingness to pay for welfare friendly meat products
    Miranda-de la Lama, G. C.
    Estevez-Moreno, L. X.
    Sepulveda, W. S.
    Estrada-Chavero, M. C.
    Rayas-Amor, A. A.
    Villarroel, M.
    Maria, G. A.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2017, 125 : 106 - 113
  • [3] Impacts of Animal Well-Being and Welfare Media on Meat Demand
    Tonsor, Glynn T.
    Olynk, Nicole J.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 62 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [4] Farm animal welfare: the five freedoms and the free market
    Webster, AJF
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2001, 161 (03) : 229 - 237
  • [5] Animal-welfare-labelled meat is not a stepping stone to animal-free diets: empirical evidence from a survey
    Bruers, Stijn
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2025, 14 (01) : 68 - 88
  • [6] Meeting Heterogeneity in Consumer Demand for Animal Welfare: A Reflection on Existing Knowledge and Implications for the Meat Sector
    de Jonge, Janneke
    van Trijp, Hans C. M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2013, 26 (03) : 629 - 661
  • [7] Segmentation of Australian meat consumers on the basis of attitudes regarding farm animal welfare and the environmental impact of meat production
    Malek, Lenka
    Umberger, Wendy J.
    Rolfe, John
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (03) : 424 - 434
  • [8] Demand for farm animal welfare and producer implications: Results from a field experiment in Michigan
    Ortega, David L.
    Wolf, Christopher A.
    FOOD POLICY, 2018, 74 : 74 - 81
  • [9] Animal welfare and microbiological safety of poultry meat: Impact of different at-farm animal welfare levels on at-slaughterhouse Campylobacter and Salmonella contamination
    Iannetti, Luigi
    Neri, Diana
    Santarelli, Gino Angelo
    Cotturone, Giuseppe
    Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
    Salini, Romolo
    Antoci, Salvatore
    Di Serafino, Gabriella
    Di Giannatale, Elisabetta
    Pomilio, Francesco
    Messori, Stefano
    FOOD CONTROL, 2020, 109
  • [10] Attitudes of meat consumers in Mexico and Spain about farm animal welfare: A cross-cultural study
    Estevez-Moreno, Laura X.
    Maria, Gustavo A.
    Sepulveda, Wilmer S.
    Villarroel, Morris
    Miranda-de la Lama, Genaro C.
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2021, 173