Construct Validity and Test Re-Test Reliability of the Forgotten Joint Score

被引：70
作者：
Thompson, Simon M. [1 ]
Salmon, Lucy J. [1 ]
Webb, Justin M. [1 ]
Pinczewski, Leo A. [1 ]
Roe, Justin P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Mater Clin, North Sydney Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Wollstonecraft, NSW 2065, Australia
来源：
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2015年 / 30卷 / 11期
关键词：
Forgotten Joint Score; arthroplasty; assessment; validity; reliability; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; VALIDATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I：
10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.001
中图分类号：
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
Consecutive patients undergoing knee arthroplasty completed questionnaires: FJS, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and WOMAC Score (mean 39 months after surgery), and were mailed a repeat questionnaire after 4 to 6 weeks. The test-retest reliability was almost perfect for the FJS (ICC = 0.97), and the FJS subdomains (ICC > 0.8). Convergent construct validity of the FJS was correlated with the KOOS Subscores of Quality of Life (0.63, P = 0.001), Symptom (0.33, P = 0.001), Pain (0.68, P = 0.001) and ADL (0.66, P = 0.001) and the Total WOMAC (0.70, P = 0.001). The FJS demonstrates high test-retest reliability and construct validity compared to the Normalised WOMAC and KOOS Subscales. The FJS does not demonstrate the ceiling effect of the WOMAC or KOOS pain scores so may have greater discriminatory ability following TKR. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1902 / 1905
页数：4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2011, Annual Report
[2]   The "Forgotten Joint" as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure [J].
Behrend, Henrik ;
Giesinger, Karlmeinrad ;
Giesinger, Johannes M. ;
Kuster, Markus S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (03) :430-436
[3]   Measuring Tools for Functional Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bourne, Robert B. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (11) :2634-2638
[4]   Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty [J].
Giesinger, K. ;
Hamilton, D. F. ;
Jost, B. ;
Holzner, B. ;
Giesinger, J. M. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2014, 22 (02) :184-189
[5]   Health-related quality of life after knee replacement - Results of the Knee Replacement Patient Outcomes Research Team Study [J].
Hawker, G ;
Wright, J ;
Coyte, P ;
Paul, J ;
Dittus, R ;
Croxford, R ;
Katz, B ;
Bombardier, C ;
Heck, D ;
Freund, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (02) :163-173
[6]   Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form [J].
Irrgang, JJ ;
Anderson, AF ;
Boland, AL ;
Harner, CD ;
Kurosaka, M ;
Neyret, P ;
Richmond, JC ;
Shelborne, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (05) :600-613
[7]   Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome [J].
Marx, RG ;
Jones, EC ;
Atwan, NC ;
Closkey, RF ;
Salvati, EA ;
Sculco, TP .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (09) :1999-2005
[8]   A New High-flexion Knee Scoring System to Eliminate the Ceiling Effect [J].
Na, Sang-Eun ;
Ha, Chul-Won ;
Lee, Choong-Hee .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (02) :584-593
[9]   The John Insall Award - Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty [J].
Noble, Philip C. ;
Conditt, Michael A. ;
Cook, Karon F. ;
Mathis, Kenneth B. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (452) :35-43
[10]   Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement [J].
Ewa M Roos ;
Sören Toksvig-Larsen .
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)
12