Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art

被引:19
作者
Phillips, H. M. [1 ]
Sahlstedt, K. E. [3 ]
Frank, K. [2 ]
Bratby, J. [4 ]
Brennan, W. [5 ]
Rogowski, S. [5 ]
Pier, D. [5 ]
Anderson, W. [5 ]
Mulas, M. [6 ]
Copp, J. B. [7 ]
Shirodkar, N. [8 ]
机构
[1] Black & Veatch Corp, Kansas City, MO 64114 USA
[2] Metcalf & Eddy AECOM, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[3] Poyry Environm Ltd, FIN-01621 Vantaa, Finland
[4] Brown & Caldwell, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[5] Metro Wastewater Reclamat Dist, Denver, CO 80229 USA
[6] Helsinki Univ Technol, Lab Proc Control & Automat, FIN-02015 Helsinki, Tkk, Finland
[7] Primodal Inc, Hamilton, ON L8S 3A4, Canada
[8] Western Branch Wastewater Treatment Plant, Upper Marlboro, MD 20772 USA
关键词
calibration; full-scale; modelling; nitrogen removal; solids balance; wastewater treatment; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2009.591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three consulting teams conducted independent modelling projects for three different wastewater treatment plants ranging in size from approximately 113,800m(3)/d (30 mgd) to 530,000m(3)/d (140 mgd), in different parts of the world (USA and Finland). The plants have different treatment objectives ranging from nitrification and partial denitrification (nitrate plus nitrite <8.7 mg/L) to enhanced nutrient removal (total nitrogen <3 mg/L, total phosphorus <0.3 mg/L). Commonly-used models were applied in the case studies, including ASM3 (using the GPS-X simulator), New General (using GPS-X), Dold (using BioWin), and a variation of the Dold model methanol degradation capabilities (NGmeth within GPS-X). The authors compare and contrast the modelling approaches taken, including calibration and validation approaches, sensitivity analyses, and the application of results to full-scale studies, designs and operations. Despite several differences between the approaches, there are many similarities which are discussed in light of the IWA draft uniform protocol for activated sludge modelling. The authors also discuss current modelling limitations and offer suggestions to improve the state of the art.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 704
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P WEFTEC 2003 76 ANN
[2]   General model for biological nutrient removal activated-sludge systems: model presentation [J].
Barker, PS ;
Dold, PL .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1997, 69 (05) :969-984
[3]  
COPP JB, 1993, THESIS MCMASTER U HA
[4]  
COPP JB, 2008, WAT SCI TEC IN PRESS
[5]  
DOLD P, 2007, P NUTR REM C EXP WAT
[6]  
FRANK K, 2007, WORKSH AN SYST AN WA
[7]  
GILLOT S, 2007, GOOD MODELL IN PRESS
[8]  
Gujer W, 1999, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V39, P183, DOI 10.2166/wst.1999.0039
[9]  
Henze M., 2006, Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3
[10]   A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems [J].
Hulsbeek, JJW ;
Kruit, J ;
Roeleveld, PJ ;
van Loosdrecht, MCM .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 45 (06) :127-136