Dose-response relationship of insulin glulisine in subjects with type 1 diabetes

被引:5
作者
Becker, R. H. A. [1 ]
Frick, A. D.
Teichert, L.
Nosek, L. [2 ]
Heinemann, L. [2 ]
Rave, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sanofi Aventis, Clin & Exploratory Pharmacol, D-65926 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Profil Inst Metab Res, Neuss, Germany
关键词
dose-response proportionality; euglycaemic glucose-clamp; insulin analogues; insulin glulisine; type; 1; diabetes; PRO(B29)>-HUMAN INSULIN; MEAL COMPOSITION; REGULAR INSULIN; ANALOGS; ASPART; LISPRO; TIME; PHARMACOKINETICS; DEPENDENCY; <LYS(B28);
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.01013.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Little is known about the dose-response relationships of rapid-acting insulin analogues in subjects with diabetes. This study compared the dose-exposure and dose-response relationships of insulin glulisine and regular human insulin (RHI) in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Eighteen male subjects with type 1 diabetes (mean glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA(1c), 7.7%; body mass index 24.5 kg/m(2)) received subcutaneous injections of insulin glulisine followed by RHI (both at doses of 0.075, 0.15 and 0.3 U/kg) in the same three-way crossover, randomized order in a euglycaemic glucose-clamp study. Insulin glulisine and RHI showed dose-proportional increases in exposure (INS-AUC(total)) and maximum serum concentration (INS-C-max) in the dose ranges 0.075, 0.15 and 0.3 U/kg. At all doses, within 2 h after injection, about twice as much insulin glulisine was absorbed as RHI (INS-AUC(0-2h): 3855, 6832 and 13237 vs. 2356, 3630 and 6231 mu U.min/mL; p < 0.05) and INS-C-max was reached in about half the time (INS-T-max: 47, 57 and 72 vs. 82, 104 and 119 min; p < 0.05). Corresponding glucose disposition was twice as large with insulin glulisine as with RHI (GIR-AUC(0-2h): 314, 491 and 536 vs. 127, 219 and 294 mg/kg; p < 0.05), but was similar in extent upon completion (GIR-AUC(total): 499, 1090 and 1476 vs. 416, 1076 and 1555 mg/kg; not significant). With escalating doses, a steady increase in insulin exposure was noticed for both insulins across the entire dose range, whereas glucose disposition increased in a dose-proportional manner only for the dose range 0.075-0.15 U/kg with insulin glulisine only. For both insulins, the end of euglycaemia occurred at insulin concentrations < 10 mu U/mL, with a subsequent rise in plasma glucose taking 80-90 min to reach >= 8.3 mmol/L (>= 150 mg/dL) and a difference in time of similar to 120 min between the insulins at any dose. Insulin glulisine presents rapid, dose-proportional absorption, resulting in saturable glucodynamic activity in subjects with type 1 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 68
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
American Diabetes Association (ADA), 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, pS121
[2]   Physicochemical basis for the rapid time-action of Lys(B28)Pro(B29)-insulin: Dissociation of a protein-ligand complex [J].
Bakaysa, DL ;
Radziuk, J ;
Havel, HA ;
Brader, ML ;
Li, S ;
Dodd, SW ;
Beals, JM ;
Pekar, AH ;
Brems, DN .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1996, 5 (12) :2521-2531
[3]  
BECKER R, 2003, DIABETOLOGIA, V46, pA775
[4]   Insulin analogues and their potential in the management of diabetes mellitus [J].
Bolli, GB ;
Di Marchi, RD ;
Park, GD ;
Pramming, S ;
Koivisto, VA .
DIABETOLOGIA, 1999, 42 (10) :1151-1167
[5]   Meal composition is a determinant of lispro-induced hypoglycemia in IDDM [J].
Burge, MR ;
Castillo, KR ;
Schade, DS .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (02) :152-155
[6]  
Frick A, 2003, DIABETOLOGIA, V46, pA268
[7]  
Frohnauer M K, 2001, Diabetes Technol Ther, V3, P419, DOI 10.1089/15209150152607204
[8]  
Garg Satish K, 2005, Endocr Pract, V11, P11
[9]  
Gerich J, 2003, DIABETES, V52, pA447
[10]  
GLULISINE I, 2006, APIDRA PRESCRIBING I