Investment risk and return under renewable decarbonization of a power market

被引:21
|
作者
Munoz, Jose I. [1 ]
Bunn, Derek W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, ETS Ingn Ind, E-13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
[2] London Business Sch, London NW1 5SA, England
关键词
coal; financing; incentives; investment; risk; wind power; REAL OPTIONS; ELECTRICITY; PRICES;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2012.750473
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
How does financial performance risk affect investments in low-carbon electricity-generating technologies to achieve climate policy targets? A detailed risk simulation of price formation in the Great Britain wholesale power market is used to show that the increasing replacement of fossil facilities with wind, ceteris paribus, may cause a deterioration of the financial riskreturn performance metrics for incremental investments. Low-carbon investments appear to be high risk, low return, and as such may require a progressively higher level of support over time than envisaged by the conventional degression trajectories. The increasing riskiness of the wholesale market will to some extent offset the benefits of lower capital costs and operational efficiencies if investors need to satisfy cautious debt coverage ratios alongside positive expected returns. This increased risk is additional to the well-known merit order effect' of low-carbon investments progressively depressing wholesale prices and hence their expected investment returns. Policy relevance Policy support for renewable technologies such as wind is usually based upon levelized costs and is expected to reduce over time as capital costs and operational efficiencies improve. However, levelized costs do not take full account of the risk aversion that investors may have in practice. Expected policy support reductions may be moderated to some extent by the increased financial performance risk that intermittent technologies bring to the power market. The annual risk-return profiles for incremental investments deteriorate for all technologies as wind replaces fossil fuels. This extra risk premium will need to be incorporated into evaluating policy incentives for new investments in a decarbonizing power market.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 105
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Probabilistic decision model of wind power investment and influence of green power market
    Gillenwater, Michael
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 1111 - 1125
  • [22] High return and low risk: Shaping composite financial investment decision in the new energy stock market
    Zhu, Qing
    Zhou, Xiaobo
    Liu, Shan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 122
  • [23] Market timing, investment, and risk management
    Bolton, Patrick
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Neng
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (01) : 40 - 62
  • [24] Multilateral agreement contract optimization of renewable energy power grid-connecting under uncertain supply and market demand
    Kong Lingcheng
    Zhu Zhenning
    Xie Jiaping
    Li Jing
    Chen Yuping
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 135 : 689 - 701
  • [25] Data-driven hybrid approaches for renewable power prediction toward grid decarbonization: Applications, issues and suggestions
    Lipu, M. S. Hossain
    Miah, Md Sazal
    Ansari, Shaheer
    Hannan, M. A.
    Hasan, Kamrul
    Sarker, Mahidur R.
    Mahmud, Md Sultan
    Hussain, Aini
    Mansor, M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
  • [26] Renewable Energy Power’s Investment and Production Strategies for a Class of Noncooperative Game Models of Power Sales With Risk Avoidance
    Li, Danhu
    Xu, Jiazhu
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 68511 - 68530
  • [27] Renewable Energy Policy Instruments and Market Power
    von der Fehr, Nils-Henrik M.
    Ropenus, Stephanie
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 119 (02): : 312 - 345
  • [29] Risk and return in the Chinese stock market: Does equity return dispersion proxy risk?
    Chen, Chun-Da
    Demirer, Riza
    Jategaonkar, Shrikant P.
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2015, 33 : 23 - 37
  • [30] Investment prospects for geothermal power in El Salvador's electricity market
    Abraham, Jun
    ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) : 3877 - 3886