Field installation versus local integration of photovoltaic systems and their effect on energy evaluation metrics

被引:18
作者
Halasah, Suleiman A. [1 ]
Pearlmutter, David [2 ]
Feuermann, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] I GREENs, Amman, Jordan
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Swiss Inst Dryland Environm Res, Jacob Blaustein Inst Desert Res, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Building-integrated photovoltaics; Life-cycle energy assessment; Solar energy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PAYBACK TIME; PV SYSTEMS; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.063
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study we employ Life-Cycle Assessment to evaluate the energy-related impacts of photovoltaic systems at different scales of integration, in an arid region with especially high solar irradiation. Based on the electrical output and embodied energy of a selection of fixed and tracking systems and including concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) and varying cell technology, we calculate a number of energy evaluation metrics, including the energy payback time (EPBT), energy return factor (ERF), and life-cycle CO2 emissions offset per unit aperture and land area. Studying these metrics in the context of a regionally limited setting, it was found that utilizing existing infrastructure such as existing building roofs and shade structures does significantly reduce the embodied energy requirements (by 20-40%) and in turn the EPBT of flat-plate PV systems due to the avoidance of energy-intensive balance of systems (BOS) components like foundations. Still, high-efficiency CPV field installations were found to yield the shortest EPBT, the highest ERF and the largest life-cycle CO2 offsets under the condition that land availability is not a limitation. A greater life-cycle energy return and carbon offset per unit land area is yielded by locally-integrated non-concentrating systems, despite their lower efficiency per unit module area. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 471
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Alsema E., 1997, UNDERSTANDING ENERGY
[2]  
[Anonymous], RENEWABLE ENERGY CON
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 24 EUR PHOT SOL EN
[4]  
Boyd S., 2005, TECHNOLOGY CHOICES P
[5]  
Bradford T., 2006, SOLAR REVOLUTION
[6]  
Cohen J., 2009, ENERGY EFFICIENCY, V3, P19
[7]  
De Wild-Scholten MJ, 2006, P 2006 MAT RES SOC S
[8]  
Der Minassians A., 2006, ENERGY PAYBACK TIME
[9]  
Faiman D, 2006, DATA PROCESSING NEGE
[10]  
Frankl P, 1998, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V6, P137, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199803/04)6:2<137::AID-PIP208>3.0.CO