Consensus statements on the BAHA system:: Where do we stand at present?

被引:223
作者
Snik, AFM
Mylanus, EAM
Proops, DW
Wolfaardt, JF
Hodgetts, WE
Somers, T
Niparko, JK
Wazen, JJ
Sterkers, O
Cremers, CWRJ
Tjellström, A
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen St Radboud Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham, Dept Otolaryngol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Alberta, Craniofacial Osseointegrat & Maxillofacial Prosth, Misericordia Community Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Sint Augustinus Hosp Wilrijk, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Antwerp, Belgium
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Paris 07, INSERM, EMI 0112, Fac Xavier Bichat, Clichy, France
[8] Hop Beaujon, Serv Otorhinolaryngol, Clichy, France
[9] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
BAHA system; bone-anchored hearing aid system; hearing loss;
D O I
10.1177/0003489405114S1201
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
After more than 25 years of clinical experience, the BAHA (bone-anchored hearing aid) system is a well-established treatment for hearing-impaired patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Owing to its success, the use of the BAHA system has spread and the indications for application have gradually become broader. New indications, as well as clinical applications, were discussed during scientific roundtable meetings in 2004 by experts in the field, and the outcomes of these discussions are presented in the form of statements. The issues that were discussed concerned BAHA surgery, the fitting range of the BAHA system, the BAHA system compared to conventional devices, bilateral application, the BAHA system in children, the BAHA system in patients with single-sided deafness, and, finally, the BAHA system in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 12
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Abrams H, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P549
[2]   Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory [J].
Arunachalam, PS ;
Kilby, D ;
Meikle, D ;
Davison, T ;
Johnson, IJM .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (07) :1260-1263
[3]   A comparison of the audiometric performance of bone anchored hearing aids and air conduction hearing aids [J].
Bance, M ;
Abel, SM ;
Papsin, BC ;
Wade, P ;
Vendramini, J .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2002, 23 (06) :912-919
[4]   The role of generic health-related quality of life measures in establishing audiological rehabilitation outcomes [J].
Bess, FH .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (04) :74S-79S
[5]  
BOOTHROYD A, 2000, SOUND FDN EARLY AMPL, P1
[6]  
Bosman AJ, 2001, AUDIOLOGY, V40, P158
[7]   The bone anchored hearing aid - The third option for otosclerosis [J].
Burrell, SP ;
Cooper, HC ;
Proops, DW .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1996, 110 :31-37
[8]   The bone-anchored hearing aid: Reference quantities and functional gain [J].
Carlsson, PU ;
Hakansson, BEV .
EAR AND HEARING, 1997, 18 (01) :34-41
[9]   Cost-utility of the cochlear implant in adults -: A meta-analysis [J].
Cheng, AK ;
Niparko, JK .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1999, 125 (11) :1214-1218
[10]   Two rare complications in patients with bone-anchored hearing aids [J].
Deitmer, T ;
Krassort, M ;
Hartmann, S .
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2003, 82 (03) :162-165