Cost-utility analyses of atypical neuroleptics:: a review

被引:0
作者
München, CS [1 ]
Laux, G [1 ]
Günther, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Klin Psychiat & Psychotherapie, D-96049 Bamberg, Germany
来源
PSYCHOPHARMAKOTHERAPIE | 2001年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
cost-utility analysis; atypical neuroleptics; direct cost of illness; indirect cost of illness; cost of life quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
This review summarizes result, of pharmacoeconomic studies on direct and indirect costs of atypical and conventional anti psychotic treatment of patients with schizophrenic psychoses. Overall costs are enormous. Although not yet sufficiently investigated, the majority of studies thus far indicate that atypical antipsychotics either reduce costs or are cost neutral. This is true for direct costs and is most likely a result of better compliance and reduction of in-patient treatment costs. It is also true for indirect cost, specifically increased quality of life of patients and their family. Empirical data are available for clozapine and to a somewhat lesser degree for risperidone and olanzapine. Comparison within atypical antipsychotics and data regarding newer substances such as quetiapine and ziprasidone are almost completely lacking. Some initial data from Germany do point in the same direction, but actually there is a complete lack of randomized prospective studies for this important topic. This kind of data though seems essential for a rational development of the future infrastructure and budget planning.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness of clozapine - A UK clinic-based study [J].
Aitchison, KJ ;
Kerwin, RW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 171 :125-130
[2]   Reduction of healthcare resource utilisation and costs following the use of risperidone for patients with schizophrenia previously treated with standard antipsychotic therapy - A retrospective analysis using the Saskatchewan Health Linkable Databases [J].
Albright, PS ;
Livingstone, S ;
Keegan, DL ;
Ingham, M ;
Shrikhande, S ;
LeLorier, J .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1996, 11 (05) :289-299
[3]   Cost analysis of the treatment of schizophrenia in the UK - A simulation model comparing olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol [J].
Almond, S ;
O'Donnell, O .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (04) :383-389
[4]   TRANSFER MAP AND FIBER BUNDLES [J].
BECKER, JC ;
GOTTLIEB, DH .
TOPOLOGY, 1975, 14 (01) :1-12
[5]  
Bret P, 1998, ENCEPHALE, V24, P365
[6]   Atypical antipsychotics: Part II - Adverse effects, drug interactions, and costs [J].
Brown, CS ;
Markowitz, JS ;
Moore, TR ;
Parker, NG .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1999, 33 (02) :210-217
[7]   Economic and health state utility determinations for schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone or haloperidol [J].
Chouinard, G ;
Albright, PS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 17 (04) :298-307
[8]   Risperidone versus haloperidol: II. Cost-effectiveness [J].
Davies, A ;
Langley, PC ;
Keks, NA ;
Catts, SV ;
Lambert, T ;
Schweitzer, I .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 20 (01) :196-213
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DRUG-THERAPY FOR TREATMENT-RESISTANT SCHIZOPHRENIA IN THE UNITED-KINGDOM [J].
DAVIES, LM ;
DRUMMOND, MF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 162 :38-42
[10]   Cost-effectiveness of clozapine compared with conventional antipsychotic medication for patients in state hospitals [J].
Essock, SM ;
Frisman, LK ;
Covell, NH ;
Hargreaves, WA .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 57 (10) :987-994