Peer review of statistics in medical research: the other problem

被引：110
作者：
Bacchetti, P [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源：
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2002年 / 324卷 / 7348期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：1271 / 1273
页数：3
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] ALBERTS BM, 2001, RECOMMENDATIONS CHAN
  • [2] Altman DG, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2661, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-B
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P197
  • [5] What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
    Black, N
    van Rooyen, S
    Godlee, F
    Smith, R
    Evans, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 231 - 233
  • [6] The importance of reviewers
    Bloom, FE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5403) : 789 - 789
  • [7] Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts
    Callaham, ML
    Baxt, WG
    Waeckerie, JF
    Wears, RL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 229 - 231
  • [8] Gleick James, 1999, FASTER ACCELERATION
  • [9] Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports - A randomized controlled trial
    Godlee, F
    Gale, CR
    Martyn, CN
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (03): : 237 - 240
  • [10] Goldbeck-Wood S, 1999, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V318, P44
12