Enterprise Risk Management Program Quality: Determinants, Value Relevance, and the Financial Crisis

被引:152
作者
Baxter, Ryan [1 ]
Bedard, Jean C. [1 ,2 ]
Hoitash, Rani [1 ]
Yezegel, Ari [1 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01194.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates factors associated with high-quality Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) programs in financial services firms, and whether ERM quality enhances performance and signals credibility to the financial markets. ERM, developed with the assistance of the accounting profession, provides a framework and plan to integrate management of all sources of risk. Challenged by measurement difficulties common to research on management control systems, prior ERM studies present mixed findings. Using ERM quality ratings of financial companies by Standard & Poor's, we find that higher ERM quality is associated with greater complexity, less resource constraint, and better corporate governance. Controlling for such characteristics, we find that higher ERM quality is associated with improved accounting performance. Results show a market reaction to signals of enhanced management control from initial ERM quality ratings and rating revisions, and a stronger response to earnings surprises for firms with higher ERM quality. Focusing on the recent global financial crisis, our analysis suggests that there is no relation between ERM quality and market performance prior to and during the market collapse. However, returns of higher ERM quality companies are higher during the market rebound. Overall, results reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-quality controls that integrate risk management efforts across the firm, enabling better oversight of managers' risk-taking behavior and aligning that behavior with the strategic direction of the company.
引用
收藏
页码:1264 / 1295
页数:32
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Abbott L.J., Parker S., Peters G.F., Audit committee characteristics and restatements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 23, 1, pp. 69-87, (2004)
[2]  
Anderson K.L., Yohn T.L., (2002)
[3]  
Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M., Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, The Journal of Finance, 58, 3, pp. 1301-1328, (2003)
[4]  
Ashbaugh-Skaife H., Collins D.W., Kinney W.R., The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 1-2, pp. 166-192, (2007)
[5]  
Ashbaugh-Skaife H., Collins D.W., Kinney J.W.R., LaFond R., The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality, The Accounting Review, 83, 1, pp. 217-250, (2008)
[6]  
Ashbaugh-Skaife H., Collins D.W., LaFond R., The effects of corporate governance on firms' credit ratings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 1-2, pp. 203-243, (2006)
[7]  
Balsam S., Krishnan J., Yang J.S., Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22, 2, pp. 71-97, (2003)
[8]  
Basu S., The relationship between earnings' yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 1, pp. 129-156, (1983)
[9]  
Beasley M.S., An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud, The Accounting Review, 71, 4, pp. 443-465, (1996)
[10]  
Beasley M.S., Branson B., Hancock B., Report on the current state of enterprise risk oversight, (2009)