Demand-Side Policy: Mechanisms for Success and Failure

被引:4
作者
Warren, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Sch Publ Policy, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Demand-side management policy; Energy efficiency policy; Demand response; Policy success; Policy evaluation; Systematic review; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; EVIDENCE BASE;
D O I
10.5547/2160-5890.8.1.pwar
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Demand-side management (DSM) policy evaluations, including energy efficiency and demand response, primarily focus on ex-ante appraisals or ex-post evaluations of impacts, such as energy savings, carbon savings and implementation costs. However, there is a knowledge gap in understanding the mechanisms bebind the success and failure of demand-side policies. The paper presents the results of a four-year project to systematically review the global evaluation evidence base in order to identify the key factors for success and failure for different types of DSM policy. The realist synthesis type of systematic review has had limited application in the energy policy field and the research developed a methodological approach to apply it to energy policy analysis. The paper inductively identifies 22 key success factors and 25 key failure factors for twelve types of demand-side policy from a sample of 102 high-quality documents, which cover 690 ex-post evaluations and 66 countries and sub-national states across six continents.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 144
页数:26
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Agnew K., 2009, INT EN PROGR EV C 20
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, EN EFF COMM 1 EEC 2
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, EN EFF COMM 1 EEC 1
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, MULT DEC MAK MCDM AN
  • [5] Atanasiu B., 2011, ECEEE SUMM STUD 2013
  • [6] Boudet H, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI [10.1038/nenergy.2016.91, 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.91]
  • [7] Cappers P., 2009, LBNL2124E
  • [8] Carbon Emissions Reduction Target (CERT), 2008, CARBON
  • [9] Community Energy Saving Programme (CESP), 2008, COMM EN SAV PROGR CE
  • [10] Dixon-Woods Mary, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P45, DOI 10.1258/1355819052801804